About: Connecticut v. Doehr

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/501/1.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6737687845557823257 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/501/1/case.html https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112615/connecticut-v-doehr/
dbo:wikiPageID	14521398 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	8016 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	993661897 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Byron_R._White dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_501 dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Connecticut dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbr:Due_process dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Connecticut dbr:Mathews_v._Eldridge dbc:1991_in_Connecticut dbc:Legal_history_of_Connecticut dbr:Connecticut_Superior_Court dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbc:1991_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Battery_(tort) dbr:Plurality_opinion dbr:William_H._Rehnquist dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Real_property dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:Harry_Blackmun dbr:Attachment_(law) dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Title_(property) dbr:Certiorari dbr:Ex_parte dbr:Surety_bond dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-01-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1991 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Connecticut v. Doehr, (en)
dbp:concurrence	Rehnquist (en) Scalia (en)
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112615/connecticut-v-doehr/
dbp:decidedate	0001-06-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1991 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/501/1.html
dbp:fullname	Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6737687845557823257
dbp:holding	A state law authorizing the prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property at the outset of a lawsuit, without notice to the defendant or a hearing and without any showing of extraordinary circumstances, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence	Blackmun (en)
dbp:joinmajority	unanimous ; Rehnquist, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter (en)
dbp:joinplurality	Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/501/1/case.html
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants	Connecticut v. Doehr (en)
dbp:majority	White (en)
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:plurality	White (en)
dbp:prior	Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (en)
dbp:uspage	1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	501 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Ussc dbt:Ct_law
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1991_in_Connecticut dbc:Legal_history_of_Connecticut dbc:1991_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment	Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
rdfs:label	Connecticut v. Doehr (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Connecticut v. Doehr yago-res:Connecticut v. Doehr wikidata:Connecticut v. Doehr https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4iRLP
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Connecticut_v._Doehr?oldid=993661897&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Connecticut_v._Doehr
foaf:name	(en) Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:501_U.S._1 dbr:Connecticut_v_Doehr
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:501_U.S._1 dbr:Attachment_(law) dbr:Connecticut_v_Doehr dbr:Provisional_remedy
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Connecticut_v._Doehr