About: Certiorari before judgment

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Certiorari before judgment Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCertiorari_before_judgment

A petition for certiorari before judgment, in the Supreme Court of the United States, is a petition for a writ of certiorari in which the Supreme Court is asked to immediately review the decision of a United States District Court, without an appeal having been decided by a United States Court of Appeals, for the purpose of expediting the proceedings and obtaining a final decision. In United States v. Windsor (2013), both sides filed petitions for certiorari before judgment, but it was only granted after judgment by the Second Circuit.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Certiorari before judgment (en)
rdfs:comment	A petition for certiorari before judgment, in the Supreme Court of the United States, is a petition for a writ of certiorari in which the Supreme Court is asked to immediately review the decision of a United States District Court, without an appeal having been decided by a United States Court of Appeals, for the purpose of expediting the proceedings and obtaining a final decision. In United States v. Windsor (2013), both sides filed petitions for certiorari before judgment, but it was only granted after judgment by the Second Circuit. (en)
dcterms:subject	Supreme Court of the United States United States appellate procedure
Wikipage page ID	21083900 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1095951980 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California Supreme Court of the United States United States appellate procedure United States District Court United States v. Booker United States v. Nixon United States v. Texas (2021) United States v. Windsor Gratz v. Bollinger Department of Commerce v. New York Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson Dames & Moore v. Regan Ex parte Quirin Supreme Court of the United States McAleenan v. Vidal Merrill v. Caster Shadow docket Writ of certiorari Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer United States Court of Appeals Trump v. NAACP United States v. United Mine Workers Ardoin v. Robinson Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. United States v. Fanfan Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina dbr:Clark_v._Roemer dbr:Gish_v._Newsom dbr:Harvest_Rock_Church,_Inc._v._Newsom dbr:High_Plains_Harvest_Church_v._Polis dbr:Robinson_v._Murphy dbr:Ross_v._California dbr:United_States_v._Higgs dbr:ZF_Automotive_US,_Inc._v._Luxshare,_Ltd.
sameAs	Certiorari before judgment Certiorari before judgment Certiorari before judgment
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Efn dbt:Notelist dbt:Reflist
has abstract	A petition for certiorari before judgment, in the Supreme Court of the United States, is a petition for a writ of certiorari in which the Supreme Court is asked to immediately review the decision of a United States District Court, without an appeal having been decided by a United States Court of Appeals, for the purpose of expediting the proceedings and obtaining a final decision. Certiorari before judgment is rarely granted. Supreme Court Rule 11 provides that this procedure will be followed "only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court." A writ of certiorari before judgment may be granted only in federal cases, and is not necessary in those cases where a statute authorizes a direct appeal from a District Court to the Supreme Court. Well-known cases in which the Supreme Court has granted certiorari before judgment and heard the case on an expedited basis have included Ex parte Quirin (1942), United States v. United Mine Workers (1947), Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952), United States v. Nixon (1974), Dames & Moore v. Regan (1981), Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. (1982), United States v. Booker (2005), Department of Commerce v. New York (2019), and Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson (2021). In United States v. Windsor (2013), both sides filed petitions for certiorari before judgment, but it was only granted after judgment by the Second Circuit. (en)
gold:hypernym	Petition
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Certiorari_before_judgment?oldid=1095951980&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	6540 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Certiorari_before_judgment
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Merrill v. Milligan Procedures of the Supreme Court of the United States Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California United States v. Booker United States v. Microsoft Corp. United States v. Texas (2021) United States v. Windsor Mistretta v. United States 2020 United States census Department of Commerce v. New York Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election (November 2020–January 2021) Barack Obama presidential eligibility litigation Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management History of same-sex marriage in the United States Texas Heartbeat Act King v. Burwell Supreme Court of the United States Sevcik v. Sandoval Certiorari Wolf v. Vidal Cert United States courts of appeals
is Wikipage disambiguates of	Cert
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Certiorari_before_judgment

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software