About: Bolling v. Sharpe

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Bolling v. Sharpe Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : umbel-rc:Event, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBolling_v._Sharpe

Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution prohibits segregated public schools in the District of Columbia. Originally argued on December 10–11, 1952, a year before Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling was reargued on December 8–9, 1953, and was unanimously decided on May 17, 1954, the same day as Brown. The Bolling decision was supplemented in 1955 with the second Brown opinion, which ordered desegregation "with all deliberate speed". In Bolling, the Court did not address school desegregation in the context of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which applies only to the states, but rather held that school segregation was unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amen

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label	Bolling v. Sharpe (en)
rdfs:comment	Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution prohibits segregated public schools in the District of Columbia. Originally argued on December 10–11, 1952, a year before Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling was reargued on December 8–9, 1953, and was unanimously decided on May 17, 1954, the same day as Brown. The Bolling decision was supplemented in 1955 with the second Brown opinion, which ordered desegregation "with all deliberate speed". In Bolling, the Court did not address school desegregation in the context of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which applies only to the states, but rather held that school segregation was unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amen (en)
foaf:name	(en) Spottswood Thomas Bolling, et al., Petitioners, v. C. Melvin Sharpe, President of the District of Columbia Board of Education, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases United States school desegregation case law 1954 in United States case law African-American history of Washington, D.C. Civil rights movement case law United States due process case law United States equal protection case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court Legal history of the District of Columbia
Wikipage page ID	399349 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1100434899 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Cass Sunstein Howard University School of Law John Philip Sousa Junior High School List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 347 United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Due Process Clause List of landmark court decisions in the United States United States Supreme Court cases Anacostia United States school desegregation case law Gardner Bishop George Edward Chalmer Hayes Equal Protection Clause 1954 in United States case law Columbia Law Review African-American history of Washington, D.C. Brown v. Board of Education Civil rights movement case law United States due process case law United States equal protection case law James Nabrit Jr. Earl Warren Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Legal case United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court L. Ed. Legal history of the District of Columbia Supreme Court of the United States District of Columbia Plessy v. Ferguson Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Michael W. McConnell Randy Barnett Certiorari Writ of certiorari Reverse incorporation U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/347/497 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/497/ http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep347/usrep347497/usrep347497.pdf
sameAs	Bolling v. Sharpe Bolling v. Sharpe Bolling v. Sharpe Bolling v. Sharpe
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Original_research dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Ussc dbt:Civil_rights_movement dbt:US5thAmendment
JoinMajority	unanimous (en)
LawsApplied	Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
ParallelCitations	74 (xsd:integer)
Prior	Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (en)
USPage	497 (xsd:integer)
USVol	347 (xsd:integer)
ArgueYear	1952 (xsd:integer)
case	Bolling v. Sharpe, (en)
DecideDate	0001-05-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1954 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Spottswood Thomas Bolling, et al., Petitioners, v. C. Melvin Sharpe, President of the District of Columbia Board of Education, et al. (en)
Holding	Racial segregation in the public schools of the District of Columbia is a denial of the due process of law guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/497/
Litigants	Bolling v. Sharpe (en)
majority	Warren (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep347/usrep347497/usrep347497.pdf
has abstract	Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution prohibits segregated public schools in the District of Columbia. Originally argued on December 10–11, 1952, a year before Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling was reargued on December 8–9, 1953, and was unanimously decided on May 17, 1954, the same day as Brown. The Bolling decision was supplemented in 1955 with the second Brown opinion, which ordered desegregation "with all deliberate speed". In Bolling, the Court did not address school desegregation in the context of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which applies only to the states, but rather held that school segregation was unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court observed that the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution lacked an Equal Protection Clause, as in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, the Court held that the concepts of equal protection and due process are not mutually exclusive, establishing the reverse incorporation doctrine. (en)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 52 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software