About: Animal protectionism     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatEthicalTheories, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FAnimal_protectionism

Animal protectionism is a position within animal rights theory that favors incremental change in pursuit of non-human animal interests. It is contrasted with abolitionism, the position that human beings have no moral right to use animals, and ought to have no legal right, no matter how the animals are treated.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Animal protectionism (en)
  • 동물보호주의 (ko)
rdfs:comment
  • 동물 보호주의(動物保護主義)은 비인간 동물의 이익의 추구의 증가를 지지하는 동물권리보호설 내에 위치한다. 이것은 폐지론과 대조되며, 그 동물이 어떻게 대해지던간에, 인간은 동물을 이용할만한 윤리상의 권리나 법적권리가 없다는 입장이다. 동물권리 보호론자들은, '"동물의 고통이 통제된다는 전제하에 음식, 의류, 오락, 그리고 실험에서 사용될 수 있다"는 동물권리 보호기준이 윤리적, 정치적으로 불합격이며, 이러한 철학은 조정될 수 있다'고 말하는 폐지론자들과 동의한다. (ko)
  • Animal protectionism is a position within animal rights theory that favors incremental change in pursuit of non-human animal interests. It is contrasted with abolitionism, the position that human beings have no moral right to use animals, and ought to have no legal right, no matter how the animals are treated. (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
has abstract
  • Animal protectionism is a position within animal rights theory that favors incremental change in pursuit of non-human animal interests. It is contrasted with abolitionism, the position that human beings have no moral right to use animals, and ought to have no legal right, no matter how the animals are treated. Animal protectionists agree with abolitionists that the animal welfare model of animal protection—whereby animals may be used as food, clothing, entertainment and in experiments so long as their suffering is regulated—has failed ethically and politically, but argue that its philosophy can be reformulated. Robert Garner of the University of Leicester, a leading academic protectionist, argues that animal use may in some circumstances be justified, though it should be better regulated, and that the pursuit of better treatment and incremental change is consistent with holding an abolitionist ideology. Gary Francione, professor of law at Rutgers School of Law-Newark and a leading abolitionist, calls this approach "new welfarism." He regards it as counter-productive because it wrongly persuades the public that the animals they use are being treated kindly, and that continued use is therefore justifiable. Francione regards the abolitionist position as the only one that can properly be called animal rights. (en)
  • 동물 보호주의(動物保護主義)은 비인간 동물의 이익의 추구의 증가를 지지하는 동물권리보호설 내에 위치한다. 이것은 폐지론과 대조되며, 그 동물이 어떻게 대해지던간에, 인간은 동물을 이용할만한 윤리상의 권리나 법적권리가 없다는 입장이다. 동물권리 보호론자들은, '"동물의 고통이 통제된다는 전제하에 음식, 의류, 오락, 그리고 실험에서 사용될 수 있다"는 동물권리 보호기준이 윤리적, 정치적으로 불합격이며, 이러한 철학은 조정될 수 있다'고 말하는 폐지론자들과 동의한다. (ko)
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is Wikipage disambiguates of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software