About: Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2)     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatEnglishUnconscionabilityCases, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FRoyal_Bank_of_Scotland_plc_v_Etridge_%28No_2%29

Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] UKHL 44 (11 October 2001) is a leading case relevant for English land law and English contract law on the circumstances under which actual and presumed undue influence can be argued to vitiate consent to a contract.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] UKHL 44 (11 October 2001) is a leading case relevant for English land law and English contract law on the circumstances under which actual and presumed undue influence can be argued to vitiate consent to a contract. (en)
name
  • RBS plc v Etridge (en)
foaf:depiction
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/RBS_Fleet_Street.jpg
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
subsequent actions
  • Wallace and Harris interlocutory; arguable cases made out; ordered: wife could go to trial hearings as to the substantial evidence; Morris interlocutory; appeal wholly allowed no need for trial. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
thumbnail
citations
  • [2001] 2 All ER 1061 (en)
  • [2001] 3 WLR 1021 (en)
  • [2001] 4 All ER 449 (en)
  • [2001] UKHL 44 (en)
  • [2002] 2 AC 773 (en)
court
  • House of Lords (en)
full name
  • Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge , Barclays Bank Plc v Coleman, Barclays Bank Plc v Harris, Midland Bank Plc v Wallace, National Westminster Bank Plc v Gill, UCB Home Loans Corp Ltd v Moore, Bank of Scotland v Bennett, Kenyon-Brown v Desmond Banks & Co (en)
keywords
  • Undue influence, matrimonial home (en)
has abstract
  • Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] UKHL 44 (11 October 2001) is a leading case relevant for English land law and English contract law on the circumstances under which actual and presumed undue influence can be argued to vitiate consent to a contract. (en)
date decided
decision by
prior actions
  • Immediate prior actions: Three appeals from pre-trial stage striking them out, five from High Court trial decision or Court of Appeal decision. (en)
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 49 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software