About: Predation problem

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Predation problem Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FPredation_problem&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org

The predation problem or predation argument refers to the consideration of the harms experienced by animals due to predation as a moral problem, that humans may or may not have an obligation to work towards preventing. Discourse on this topic has, by and large, been held within the disciplines of animal and environmental ethics. The issue has particularly been discussed in relation to animal rights and wild animal suffering. Some critics have considered an obligation to prevent predation as untenable or absurd and have used the position as a reductio ad absurdum to reject the concept of animal rights altogether. Others have criticized any obligation implied by the animal rights position as environmentally harmful.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing
rdfs:label	Predation problem (en) Problema da predação (pt)
rdfs:comment	The predation problem or predation argument refers to the consideration of the harms experienced by animals due to predation as a moral problem, that humans may or may not have an obligation to work towards preventing. Discourse on this topic has, by and large, been held within the disciplines of animal and environmental ethics. The issue has particularly been discussed in relation to animal rights and wild animal suffering. Some critics have considered an obligation to prevent predation as untenable or absurd and have used the position as a reductio ad absurdum to reject the concept of animal rights altogether. Others have criticized any obligation implied by the animal rights position as environmentally harmful. (en) O argumento ou problema da predação refere-se à consideração dos danos sofridos pelos animais devido à predação como um problema moral, que os humanos podem ou não ter a obrigação de trabalhar para prevenir. O discurso sobre este tópico tem, em geral, sido realizado dentro das disciplinas de ética animal e ambiental. A questão foi particularmente discutida em relação aos direitos dos animais e ao sofrimento de animais selvagens. Alguns críticos consideraram a obrigação de prevenir a predação como insustentável ou absurda e usaram a posição como reductio ad absurdum para rejeitar completamente o conceito de direitos dos animais. Outros criticaram qualquer obrigação implícita na posição dos direitos dos animais como prejudicial ao meio ambiente. (pt)
rdfs:seeAlso	Problem of evil Animal suffering
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Philosophical problems Wild animal suffering Predation
Wikipage page ID	64498608 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1090182670 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Carnivora Philosophical problems Problem of evil Environmental ethics Moral Inquiries on the Situation of Man and of Brutes David George Ritchie David Hume David Pearce (philosopher) Animal ethics Animals' Rights Wild animal suffering Holmes Rolston III Peter Singer Peter Vallentyne Domestic sheep predation J. Baird Callicott Reductio ad absurdum Predation Why I Am a Vegetarian Coyote Genome editing Natural selection Game (hunting) Giacomo Leopardi Thomas Aquinas Animal rights Leonardo da Vinci Lewis Gompertz Stephen R. L. Clark Felicity Huntingford Predation Tom Regan Tyler Cowen William Paley Land ethic Natural evil Ecology Farmed salmon predation Carnivorous Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Edward Augustus Kendall Fall of man J. Howard Moore Jeff McMahan (philosopher) Arthur Schopenhauer Charles Darwin Herbivore Relationship between animal ethics and environmental ethics Philosophical pessimism Plutarch Ichneumonidae Michael Pollan Operette morali Cat predation on wildlife Seal (animal) Wild animal suffering Theodicy Steve Sapontzis The Meat Eaters The New Ethics Natural Theology or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity Wolf reintroduction Hebrew Scripture Christian Scripture Wildlife culling Zibaldone di pensieri Immunocontraceptives
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-015-9281-2%7Cjournal=Res https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110702255-025/html%7Cwork=Crisis https://philarchive.org/archive/GARTVO-7%7Ctitle=Two
sameAs	Predation problem Predation problem Predation problem Predation problem
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Animal_rights dbt:Wild_animal_suffering dbt:Citation dbt:Cite_book dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Rp dbt:See_also dbt:Short_description dbt:Environmental_humanities
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/SnowyOwlAmericanBlackDuck.jpg?width=300
has abstract	The predation problem or predation argument refers to the consideration of the harms experienced by animals due to predation as a moral problem, that humans may or may not have an obligation to work towards preventing. Discourse on this topic has, by and large, been held within the disciplines of animal and environmental ethics. The issue has particularly been discussed in relation to animal rights and wild animal suffering. Some critics have considered an obligation to prevent predation as untenable or absurd and have used the position as a reductio ad absurdum to reject the concept of animal rights altogether. Others have criticized any obligation implied by the animal rights position as environmentally harmful. Responses from animal ethicists and rights advocates have been varied. Some have rejected the claim that animal rights as a position implies that we are obligated to prevent predation, while others have argued that the animal rights position does imply that predation is something that we should try to avert. Others have asserted that it is not something that we should do anything about now due to the risk that we could inadvertently cause significant harm, but that it is something that we may be able to effectively take action on in the future with improved knowledge and technologies. (en) O argumento ou problema da predação refere-se à consideração dos danos sofridos pelos animais devido à predação como um problema moral, que os humanos podem ou não ter a obrigação de trabalhar para prevenir. O discurso sobre este tópico tem, em geral, sido realizado dentro das disciplinas de ética animal e ambiental. A questão foi particularmente discutida em relação aos direitos dos animais e ao sofrimento de animais selvagens. Alguns críticos consideraram a obrigação de prevenir a predação como insustentável ou absurda e usaram a posição como reductio ad absurdum para rejeitar completamente o conceito de direitos dos animais. Outros criticaram qualquer obrigação implícita na posição dos direitos dos animais como prejudicial ao meio ambiente. As respostas de especialistas em ética animal e defensores dos direitos foram variadas. Alguns rejeitaram a afirmação de que os direitos dos animais como uma posição implica que somos obrigados a prevenir a predação, enquanto outros argumentam que a posição dos direitos dos animais implica que a predação é algo que devemos tentar evitar. Outros afirmaram que não é algo sobre o qual devemos fazer algo agora devido ao risco de inadvertidamente causar danos significativos, mas que é algo sobre o qual podemos efetivamente agir no futuro com melhorias conhecimento e tecnologias. (pt)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 39 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software