This HTML5 document contains 72 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n12http://ur.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Urban_township
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Urban_town
Subject Item
dbr:Zărnești
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Urban_town
Subject Item
dbr:Administrative_divisions_of_Wisconsin
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Urban_town
Subject Item
dbr:Urban_town
rdf:type
yago:GeographicalArea108574314 yago:AdministrativeDistrict108491826 yago:UrbanArea108675967 yago:Region108630985 dbo:MeanOfTransportation yago:Municipality108626283 yago:WikicatAdministrativeDivisions yago:Object100002684 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:District108552138 yago:YagoLegalActorGeo yago:Town108665504 yago:YagoGeoEntity yago:PhysicalEntity100001930 yago:WikicatTownsInWisconsin yago:Location100027167
rdfs:label
Urban town
rdfs:comment
An urban town is a proposed classification for towns in the state of Wisconsin, similar to the urban townships of Minnesota and Ohio. The concept, originally proposed in 2001, as AB501, limited the classification to towns with over 7,500 people. The proposal has gained support from such organizations as the Wisconsin Towns Association. The impetus that originally spawned the concept of urban towns was an effort to stem annexation of urbanized areas in unincorporated area by cities and villages across county lines. Obtaining "urban town" status effectively freezes the town's boundaries. While urban towns would have substantially greater zoning and regulatory rights than "rural towns", the status would not confer "incorporated" status on the municipality, freeing them from several responsibi
dcterms:subject
dbc:Types_of_administrative_division dbc:Towns_in_Wisconsin
dbo:wikiPageID
4517445
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1097458076
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Urban_area dbr:Incorporated_town dbr:Salem,_Kenosha_County,_Wisconsin dbr:Lisbon,_Waukesha_County,_Wisconsin dbr:Grand_Rapids,_Wisconsin dbr:Somers,_Wisconsin dbc:Types_of_administrative_division dbr:Menasha_(town),_Wisconsin dbr:Harrison_(town),_Calumet_County,_Wisconsin dbr:Merton_(town),_Wisconsin dbr:Grand_Chute,_Wisconsin dbr:Genesee,_Wisconsin dbr:Oconomowoc_(town),_Wisconsin dbr:Ohio dbr:Minnesota dbr:Wisconsin_Towns_Association dbr:Norway,_Wisconsin dbr:Waukesha_(town),_Wisconsin dbr:Springfield,_Dane_County,_Wisconsin dbr:Urban_township dbr:Greenville,_Wisconsin dbr:Wisconsin dbr:U.S._state dbr:Unincorporated_area dbr:Civil_township dbr:Rib_Mountain_(town),_Wisconsin dbr:Illinois dbc:Towns_in_Wisconsin dbr:Delafield_(town),_Wisconsin
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q7900179 n12:شہری_ٹاؤن yago-res:Urban_town n17:4wW1c freebase:m.0c6qg_
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:OR dbt:Short_description dbt:Update dbt:Wisconsin-stub
dbo:abstract
An urban town is a proposed classification for towns in the state of Wisconsin, similar to the urban townships of Minnesota and Ohio. The concept, originally proposed in 2001, as AB501, limited the classification to towns with over 7,500 people. The proposal has gained support from such organizations as the Wisconsin Towns Association. The impetus that originally spawned the concept of urban towns was an effort to stem annexation of urbanized areas in unincorporated area by cities and villages across county lines. Obtaining "urban town" status effectively freezes the town's boundaries. While urban towns would have substantially greater zoning and regulatory rights than "rural towns", the status would not confer "incorporated" status on the municipality, freeing them from several responsibilities incumbent upon incorporated municipal governments, thus distinguishing them from the incorporated towns of Illinois. In the time since the idea was originally proposed, many of the towns that would have been affected have since incorporated, but 2004 population estimates indicate that a number of towns that would have been ineligible in 2001, now are. As of March 2007, the eligible include: * Delafield (town), Wisconsin (Waukesha County) * Genesee, Wisconsin (Waukesha County) * Grand Chute, Wisconsin (Outagamie County) * Grand Rapids, Wisconsin (Wood County) * Greenville, Wisconsin (Outagamie County) * Harrison, Calumet County, Wisconsin * Lisbon, Waukesha County, Wisconsin * Menasha (town), Wisconsin (Winnebago County) * Merton (town), Wisconsin (Waukesha County) * Norway, Wisconsin (Racine County) * Oconomowoc (town), Wisconsin (Waukesha County) * Rib Mountain, Wisconsin (Marathon County) * Salem, Kenosha County, Wisconsin * Somers, Wisconsin (Kenosha County) * Springfield, Dane County, Wisconsin * Waukesha (town), Wisconsin (Waukesha County) If current trends continue, over a dozen other towns will fit the population requirements by the 2010 census.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Classification
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Urban_town?oldid=1097458076&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
3232
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Urban_town
Subject Item
dbr:Urban_town_(Wisconsin)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Urban_town
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Urban_town
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Urban_town
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Urban_town