An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 1346366 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11320 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1123188358 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:c
  • 益和 (en)
dbp:case
  • Yick Wo v. Hopkins, (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1886 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Yick Wo v. Hopkins, Sheriff (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Racially discriminatory application of a racially neutral statute violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Supreme Court of California and Circuit Court for the District of California reversed. (en)
dbp:j
  • jik1 wo4 (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Yick Wo v. Hopkins (en)
  • Wo Lee v. Hopkins (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Matthews (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 6 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior
  • In re Yick Wo, writ of habeas corpus denied, 9 P. 139 ; In re Wo Lee, writ of habeas corpus denied, 26 F. 471 (en)
dbp:submitdate
  • 0001-04-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:submityear
  • 1886 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 356 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 118 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Yick Wo v. Hopkins (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Yick Wo v. Hopkins, Sheriff (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is rdfs:seeAlso of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License