An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7 (2008), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning whether federal law restricted the United States Navy's ability to use sonar during drills given the possibility of a harmful effect on marine mammals such as whales.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7 (2008), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning whether federal law restricted the United States Navy's ability to use sonar during drills given the possibility of a harmful effect on marine mammals such as whales. In balancing military preparedness against environmental concerns, the majority came down solidly on the side of national security. Chief Justice Roberts wrote in his opinion, “the most serious possible injury would be harm to an unknown number of marine mammals that they study and observe”. By contrast, he continued, “forcing the Navy to deploy an inadequately trained antisubmarine force jeopardizes the safety of the fleet”. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 19679822 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11301 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1104908160 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2008 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Breyer (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-11-12 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2008 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:docket
  • 7 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Donald C. Winter, Secretary of the Navy, et al., Petitioners v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Military preparedness outweighs environmental concerns, as Navy needs to train its crews to detect modern, silent submarines, and it cannot be forced to turn off its sonar when whales are spotted nearby. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Souter (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council (en)
dbp:majority
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 7 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 555 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7 (2008), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning whether federal law restricted the United States Navy's ability to use sonar during drills given the possibility of a harmful effect on marine mammals such as whales. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Donald C. Winter, Secretary of the Navy, et al., Petitioners v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License