An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case from the October 2018 term. In a split opinion, the Court held that the state of Virginia's ban on uranium mining did not conflict with the Atomic Energy Act. This case is significant because of its strong impact on environmentalism as well as its discussion of the interplay between state's rights and federal supremacy. It also featured an extensive discussion as to what extent courts should evaluate a legislature's motive for passing a law.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case from the October 2018 term. In a split opinion, the Court held that the state of Virginia's ban on uranium mining did not conflict with the Atomic Energy Act. This case is significant because of its strong impact on environmentalism as well as its discussion of the interplay between state's rights and federal supremacy. It also featured an extensive discussion as to what extent courts should evaluate a legislature's motive for passing a law. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 62444502 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 12225 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1025371613 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2018 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren, 587 U.S. ___ (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2019 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:docket
  • 16 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Virginia Uranium Inc., et al., v. John Warren, et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • The Atomic Energy Act does not preempt Virginia's moratorium on uranium mining (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Breyer, Alito (en)
dbp:joinplurality
  • Thomas, Kavanaugh (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Virginia Uranium, Inc v. Warren (en)
dbp:opinionannouncement
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:plurality
  • Gorsuch (en)
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:usvol
  • 587 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case from the October 2018 term. In a split opinion, the Court held that the state of Virginia's ban on uranium mining did not conflict with the Atomic Energy Act. This case is significant because of its strong impact on environmentalism as well as its discussion of the interplay between state's rights and federal supremacy. It also featured an extensive discussion as to what extent courts should evaluate a legislature's motive for passing a law. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Virginia Uranium Inc., et al., v. John Warren, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License