About: Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, 140 S. Ct. 1367, was a 2020 decision by the United States Supreme Court regarding whether inter partes review institution decisions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office were subject to judicial review. Writing for the majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued an opinion finding that such decisions were not judicially reviewable. Justices Neil Gorsuch and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the majority's ruling, arguing that neither Congress or the Constitution authorized a lack of judicial review of such decisions.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, 140 S. Ct. 1367, was a 2020 decision by the United States Supreme Court regarding whether inter partes review institution decisions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office were subject to judicial review. Writing for the majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued an opinion finding that such decisions were not judicially reviewable. Justices Neil Gorsuch and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the majority's ruling, arguing that neither Congress or the Constitution authorized a lack of judicial review of such decisions. (en)
dbo:thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg_2016_portrait.jpg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/314 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/315 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-916
dbo:wikiPageID	69554350 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	7571 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1075608406 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:En_banc dbc:2020_in_United_States_case_law dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit dbr:United_States_Patent_and_Trademark_Office dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Inter_partes_review dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:File:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg_2016_portrait.jpg dbc:United_States_patent_case_law dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:Neil_Gorsuch dbr:Oil_States_Energy_Services,_LLC_v._Greene's_Energy_Group,_LLC dbr:Certiorari dbr:Cuozzo_Speed_Technologies,_LLC_v._Lee
dbp:arguedate	0001-12-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2019 (xsd:integer)
dbp:decidedate	0001-04-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2020 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Gorsuch (en)
dbp:docket	18 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP (en)
dbp:joindissent	Sotomayor (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Thomas, Alito, Roberts, Kagan, Kavanaugh (en)
dbp:lawsapplied	35 (xsd:integer)
dbp:litigants	Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP (en)
dbp:majority	Ginsburg (en)
dbp:oralargument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-916
dbp:parallelcitations	140 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:2020_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_patent_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, 140 S. Ct. 1367, was a 2020 decision by the United States Supreme Court regarding whether inter partes review institution decisions by the United States Patent and Trademark Office were subject to judicial review. Writing for the majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued an opinion finding that such decisions were not judicially reviewable. Justices Neil Gorsuch and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the majority's ruling, arguing that neither Congress or the Constitution authorized a lack of judicial review of such decisions. (en)
rdfs:label	Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP https://global.dbpedia.org/id/GJRWR dbr:Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Thryv,_Inc._v._Click-To-Call_Technologies,_LP?oldid=1075608406&ns=0
foaf:depiction	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg_2016_portrait.jpg
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Thryv,_Inc._v._Click-To-Call_Technologies,_LP
foaf:name	Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Thryv,_Inc._v_Click-To-Call_Technologies,_LP
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_patent_case_law dbr:Inter_partes_review dbr:Thryv,_Inc._v_Click-To-Call_Technologies,_LP
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Thryv,_Inc._v._Click-To-Call_Technologies,_LP