| dbo:abstract
|
- Subject-matter jurisdiction (also called jurisdiction ratione materiae) is the authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a specific subject matter. For instance, bankruptcy court only has the authority to hear bankruptcy cases. Subject-matter jurisdiction must be distinguished from personal jurisdiction, which is the power of a court to render a judgment against a particular defendant, and territorial jurisdiction, which is the power of the court to render a judgment concerning events that have occurred within a well-defined territory. Unlike personal or territorial jurisdiction, lack of subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived. A judgment from a court that did not have subject-matter jurisdiction is forever a nullity. To decide a case, a court must have a combination of subject (subjectam) and either personal (personam) or territorial (locum) jurisdiction. Subject-matter jurisdiction, personal or territorial jurisdiction, and adequate notice are the three most fundamental constitutional requirements for a valid judgment. (en)
- 사물관할(subject-matter jurisdiction, 혹은 대물관할)은 영미법의 개념으로 법원이 특정 법정분쟁중인 사물에 대해 관할권을 가지고 있는지 여부를 말한다. 대인관할(personal jurisdiction)과 대응되는 개념으로서 사물관할권이 없는 법원에서의 판결은 법적효력이 없다. 사물관할, 대인관할, 적절한 공시(adaquate notice)는 유효한 판결에 필요한 3가지 요소이다. (ko)
|
| rdfs:comment
|
- 사물관할(subject-matter jurisdiction, 혹은 대물관할)은 영미법의 개념으로 법원이 특정 법정분쟁중인 사물에 대해 관할권을 가지고 있는지 여부를 말한다. 대인관할(personal jurisdiction)과 대응되는 개념으로서 사물관할권이 없는 법원에서의 판결은 법적효력이 없다. 사물관할, 대인관할, 적절한 공시(adaquate notice)는 유효한 판결에 필요한 3가지 요소이다. (ko)
- Subject-matter jurisdiction (also called jurisdiction ratione materiae) is the authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a specific subject matter. For instance, bankruptcy court only has the authority to hear bankruptcy cases. Subject-matter jurisdiction, personal or territorial jurisdiction, and adequate notice are the three most fundamental constitutional requirements for a valid judgment. (en)
|
