An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

Street v. New York, 394 U.S. 576 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a New York state law making it a crime "publicly [to] mutilate, deface, defile, or defy, trample upon, or cast contempt upon either by words or act [any flag of the United States]" was, in part, unconstitutional because it prohibited speech against the flag. The Court left for a later day the question of whether it is constitutional or unconstitutional to prohibit, without reference to the utterance of words, the burning of the flag (see Texas v. Johnson and United States v. Eichman).

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Street v. New York, 394 U.S. 576 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a New York state law making it a crime "publicly [to] mutilate, deface, defile, or defy, trample upon, or cast contempt upon either by words or act [any flag of the United States]" was, in part, unconstitutional because it prohibited speech against the flag. The Court left for a later day the question of whether it is constitutional or unconstitutional to prohibit, without reference to the utterance of words, the burning of the flag (see Texas v. Johnson and United States v. Eichman). (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 16612656 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 18674 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1055163142 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1968 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Street v. New York, (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-04-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1969 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Warren (en)
  • Black (en)
  • White (en)
  • Fortas (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Sidney Street v. State of New York (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • To punish the defendant for his words criticizing the American flag would violate the First Amendment. Because the conviction was potentially based in part on the defendant's words, the conviction was reversed, and the case remanded to the state courts for further proceedings. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Street v. New York (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:subsequent
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 576 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 394 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Street v. New York, 394 U.S. 576 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a New York state law making it a crime "publicly [to] mutilate, deface, defile, or defy, trample upon, or cast contempt upon either by words or act [any flag of the United States]" was, in part, unconstitutional because it prohibited speech against the flag. The Court left for a later day the question of whether it is constitutional or unconstitutional to prohibit, without reference to the utterance of words, the burning of the flag (see Texas v. Johnson and United States v. Eichman). (en)
rdfs:label
  • Street v. New York (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Sidney Street v. State of New York (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License