Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, 571 U.S. 69 (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which a unanimous Court held that federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. The case involved a dispute between Sprint Corporation and Windstream Communications.
Property | Value |
---|---|
dbo:abstract |
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink | |
dbo:wikiPageID |
|
dbo:wikiPageLength |
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
|
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
|
dbp:arguedate |
|
dbp:argueyear |
|
dbp:case |
|
dbp:decidedate |
|
dbp:decideyear |
|
dbp:docket |
|
dbp:fullname |
|
dbp:holding |
|
dbp:joinmajority |
|
dbp:justia | |
dbp:litigants |
|
dbp:majority |
|
dbp:oralargument | |
dbp:otherSource |
|
dbp:otherUrl | |
dbp:oyez | |
dbp:parallelcitations |
|
dbp:prior |
|
dbp:uspage |
|
dbp:usvol |
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
dcterms:subject | |
rdf:type | |
rdfs:comment |
|
rdfs:label |
|
owl:sameAs | |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | |
foaf:name |
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |