An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, 571 U.S. 69 (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which a unanimous Court held that federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. The case involved a dispute between Sprint Corporation and Windstream Communications.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, 571 U.S. 69 (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which a unanimous Court held that federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. The case involved a dispute between Sprint Corporation and Windstream Communications. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 43182037 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6491 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1093953019 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-12-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 12 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Sprint Communications Inc., Petitioner v. Elizabeth S. Jacobs et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • Federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs (en)
dbp:majority
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 69 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 571 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, 571 U.S. 69 (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which a unanimous Court held that federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. The case involved a dispute between Sprint Corporation and Windstream Communications. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Sprint Communications Inc., Petitioner v. Elizabeth S. Jacobs et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License