An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

Pharrell Williams et al. v Bridgeport Music et al., No. 15-56880 (9th Cir. July 11, 2018) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case concerning copyright infringement of sound recording. In August 2013, Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke and Clifford Joseph Harris (known by his stage name "T.I.") filed a complaint for declaratory relief against the members of Marvin Gaye's family and Bridgeport Music in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, that the song "Blurred Lines" did not infringe the copyright of defendants in "Got to Give It Up" and "Sexy Ways" respectively.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Pharrell Williams et al. v Bridgeport Music et al., No. 15-56880 (9th Cir. July 11, 2018) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case concerning copyright infringement of sound recording. In August 2013, Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke and Clifford Joseph Harris (known by his stage name "T.I.") filed a complaint for declaratory relief against the members of Marvin Gaye's family and Bridgeport Music in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, that the song "Blurred Lines" did not infringe the copyright of defendants in "Got to Give It Up" and "Sexy Ways" respectively. On October 6, 2017, the Circuit Court held oral arguments on the appeal to vacate the district court's judgement. The Ninth Circuit upheld the District Court's decision against Williams and Thicke and affirmed liability of millions of dollars in damages. It was established that "Got to Give It Up" is "entitled to broad protection against copyright infringement liability because musical compositions are not confined to a narrow range of expression". (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 64331552 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 18033 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1115732599 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:appealedFrom
dbp:arguedate
  • 2017-10-06 (xsd:date)
dbp:citation
  • 25920.0
dbp:concurring
  • Mary H. Murguia (en)
dbp:courtname
dbp:decidedate
  • 2018-03-22 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy
  • Milan D. Smith Jr (en)
dbp:dissenting
  • Jacqueline H. Nguyen (en)
dbp:fullName
  • Pharrell Williams et al v. Bridgeport Music et al (en)
dbp:holding
  • The panel partially affirmed the District Court's judgement after a jury trial. Copyright protection in musical composition is not limited to a narrow range of expressions. (en)
dbp:judges
  • Milan Smith, Mary H. Murguia,and Jacqueline H. Nguyen (en)
dbp:lawsapplied
  • Copyright Act of 1976; 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, 106, 504, 505 (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Pharrell Williams et al. v Bridgeport Music et al., No. 15-56880 (9th Cir. July 11, 2018) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case concerning copyright infringement of sound recording. In August 2013, Pharrell Williams, Robin Thicke and Clifford Joseph Harris (known by his stage name "T.I.") filed a complaint for declaratory relief against the members of Marvin Gaye's family and Bridgeport Music in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, that the song "Blurred Lines" did not infringe the copyright of defendants in "Got to Give It Up" and "Sexy Ways" respectively. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Pharrell Williams v. Bridgeport Music (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License