| dbo:abstract
|
- Krouse v. Graham, 19 Cal.3d 59 (1977), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California ruling that a lack of visual perception of an accident did not necessarily preclude recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 4347 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:associatejudges
|
- Stanley Mosk, William P. Clark Jr., Frank K. Richardson, Raymond L. Sullivan, Donald Wright (en)
|
| dbp:case
| |
| dbp:chiefjudge
| |
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-03-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Benjamin Clifford Krouse et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Homer Adams Graham, Defendant and Appellant. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- Obtaining a recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress does not require visual perception of the event. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Tobriner, Sullivan, Wright (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:leagle
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:otherSource
|
- Stanford Law Library (en)
|
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:vlex
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Krouse v. Graham, 19 Cal.3d 59 (1977), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California ruling that a lack of visual perception of an accident did not necessarily preclude recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
