An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918), also known as INS v. AP or simply the INS case, is a 1918 decision of the United States Supreme Court that enunciated the misappropriation doctrine of federal intellectual property common law—that a "quasi-property right" may be created against others by one's investment of effort and money in an intangible thing, such as information or a design. The doctrine is highly controversial and criticized by many legal scholars, but it has its supporters.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918), also known as INS v. AP or simply the INS case, is a 1918 decision of the United States Supreme Court that enunciated the misappropriation doctrine of federal intellectual property common law—that a "quasi-property right" may be created against others by one's investment of effort and money in an intangible thing, such as information or a design. The doctrine is highly controversial and criticized by many legal scholars, but it has its supporters. The INS decision recognized the doctrine of U.S. copyright law that there is no copyright in facts, which the Supreme Court later greatly elaborated in the Feist case in 1991, but nonetheless INS extended the prior law of unfair competition to cover an additional type of interference with business expectations: "misappropriation" of the product of "sweat of the brow." The case was decided during a period when a body of federal common law existed for business practices and torts, which the Supreme Court had power to declare or create, but two decades later the Supreme Court abolished that body of substantive law and held that state law must govern the field henceforth. Accordingly, the INS case no longer has precedential force, although state courts are free to follow its reasoning if they so choose. (en)
  • L'Arrêt International News Service contre Associated Press est un arrêt de la Cour suprême des États-Unis pris en 1918. Il pose la question du droit d'une agence de presse à reproduire les nouvelles diffusées par une autre agence sans payer. La Cour suprême répondit que l'Associated Press avait le droit de protéger le coût de la recherche de l'information car ne pas le payer du tout rendrait sa recherche prohibitif. (fr)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 1934634 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 38816 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1084316851 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedatea
  • 0001-05-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:arguedateb
  • 3 (xsd:integer)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1918 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • International News Service v. Associated Press, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-12-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1918 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Holmes (en)
  • Brandeis (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • International News Service v. Associated Press (en)
dbp:holding
  • While the information found in AP news was not copyrightable and subject to publici juris, AP has a quasi-property interest during the production of "hot news". (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • McKenna (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • White, Day, Van Devanter, McReynolds (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • International News Service v. Associated Press (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Pitney (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Clarke (en)
dbp:overruled
  • (en)
  • Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. (en)
  • Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 39 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 215 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 248 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • L'Arrêt International News Service contre Associated Press est un arrêt de la Cour suprême des États-Unis pris en 1918. Il pose la question du droit d'une agence de presse à reproduire les nouvelles diffusées par une autre agence sans payer. La Cour suprême répondit que l'Associated Press avait le droit de protéger le coût de la recherche de l'information car ne pas le payer du tout rendrait sa recherche prohibitif. (fr)
  • International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918), also known as INS v. AP or simply the INS case, is a 1918 decision of the United States Supreme Court that enunciated the misappropriation doctrine of federal intellectual property common law—that a "quasi-property right" may be created against others by one's investment of effort and money in an intangible thing, such as information or a design. The doctrine is highly controversial and criticized by many legal scholars, but it has its supporters. (en)
rdfs:label
  • International News Service v. Associated Press (en)
  • International News Service v. Associated Press (fr)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • International News Service v. Associated Press (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License