About: Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., 573 U.S. 258 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding class action certification for a securities fraud claim. Under the fraud-on-the-market theory, the Court had to inquire as to if markets are economically efficient. The Court presumed they are. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-317_mlho.pdf https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/258/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_13_317 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/13-317 http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/halliburton-co-v-erica-p-john-fund-inc/
dbo:wikiPageID	45673845 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	15100 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1096277717 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:Economic_efficiency dbr:Prescott_Bush dbr:Basic_Inc._v._Levinson dbr:David_Boies dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_573 dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_Texas dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Chicago_school_of_economics dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Class_action dbr:Fraud-on-the-market_theory dbc:Dick_Cheney dbr:Stare_decisis dbr:Bush_v._Gore dbr:Dresser_Industries dbr:George_W._Bush_presidential_campaign,_2000 dbr:Economically_efficient dbr:Erica_P._John_Fund,_Inc._v._Halliburton_Co. dbr:Eugene_Fama dbr:Capitalism dbr:Halliburton dbr:Asbestos dbc:United_States_class_action_case_law dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_securities_case_law dbr:Chief_Justice_Roberts dbr:Justice_Alito dbr:Justice_Scalia dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Dick_Cheney dbc:Halliburton dbr:Financial_market_efficiency dbr:Securities_Exchange_Act_of_1934 dbr:Value_investing dbr:In_terrorem dbr:Securities_fraud dbr:SEC_Rule_10b-5 dbr:Nobel_Prize_in_Economics dbr:Archbishop_of_Milwaukee dbr:Bob_Shiller dbr:Fifth_Circuit dbr:Efficient_market_hypothesis dbr:Rule_10b-5 dbr:Justice_Breyer dbr:Justice_Ginsburg dbr:Justice_Sotomayor
dbp:arguedate	0001-03-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., (en)
dbp:concurrence	Thomas (en) Ginsburg (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-06-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket	13 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Halliburton Co., et al. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., fka Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. (en)
dbp:holding	Securities fraud defendants must be afforded an opportunity to rebut the presumption of reliance before class certification with evidence of a lack of price impact. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence	Scalia, Alito (en) Breyer, Sotomayor (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/258/
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Securities_Exchange_Act_of_1934 dbr:Rule_10b-5
dbp:litigants	Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. (en)
dbp:majority	Roberts (en)
dbp:opinionannouncement	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-317_mlho.pdf
dbp:oralargument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_13_317
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-317_mlho.pdf
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/13-317
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	172800.0
dbp:uspage	258 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	573 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:Economic_efficiency dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:Dick_Cheney dbc:United_States_class_action_case_law dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_securities_case_law dbc:Halliburton
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., 573 U.S. 258 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding class action certification for a securities fraud claim. Under the fraud-on-the-market theory, the Court had to inquire as to if markets are economically efficient. The Court presumed they are. (en)
rdfs:label	Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. yago-res:Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. wikidata:Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/tsUv dbr:Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Halliburton_Co._v._Erica_P._John_Fund,_Inc.?oldid=1096277717&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Halliburton_Co._v._Erica_P._John_Fund,_Inc.
foaf:name	(en) Halliburton Co., et al. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., fka Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Halliburton_Co._v_Erica_P._John_Fund,_Inc.
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Halliburton_Co._v_Erica_P._John_Fund,_Inc. dbr:Securities_Exchange_Act_of_1934
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Halliburton_Co._v._Erica_P._John_Fund,_Inc.