dbo:abstract
|
- Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 is the leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on publication bans and their relation to the right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It was held that judges have a common law discretionary authority to impose publication bans on information revealed in a criminal trial. The judge, however, must weigh competing rights, such as freedom of expression and right to a fair trial, to mizzen the violation of rights. It was further held that the media has a right to appeal a decision of a publication ban. (en)
- Dagenais c. Société Radio-Canada est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 1994 concernant les ordonnances de non-publication et leur relation à la liberté d'expression prévue à l'article 2b) de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. (fr)
|
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 4923 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:caseName
|
- Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp (en)
|
dbp:citations
|
- [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; 1994 CanLII 39 ; , 120 D.L.R. 12; , 94 C.C.C. 289; , 25 C.R.R. 1; , 34 C.R. 269; , 76 O.A.C. 81 (en)
|
dbp:concurrence
| |
dbp:decidedDate
| |
dbp:dissent
|
- L'Heureux-Dubé J. (en)
- La Forest J. (en)
- Gonthier J. (en)
|
dbp:fullCaseName
|
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and the National Film Board of Canada v. Lucien Dagenais, Léopold Monette, Joseph Dugas and Robert Radford (en)
|
dbp:heardDate
| |
dbp:history
|
- Judgment for the respondents in the Court of Appeal for Ontario (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Sopinka, Cory, Iacobucci and Major JJ. (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:scc
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 is the leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on publication bans and their relation to the right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It was held that judges have a common law discretionary authority to impose publication bans on information revealed in a criminal trial. The judge, however, must weigh competing rights, such as freedom of expression and right to a fair trial, to mizzen the violation of rights. It was further held that the media has a right to appeal a decision of a publication ban. (en)
- Dagenais c. Société Radio-Canada est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 1994 concernant les ordonnances de non-publication et leur relation à la liberté d'expression prévue à l'article 2b) de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. (fr)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp (en)
- Dagenais c. Société Radio-Canada (fr)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |