| dbo:abstract
|
- Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whether the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a taxpayer's attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is income to the taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. The Supreme Court held when a taxpayer's recovery constitutes income, the taxpayer's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee. Employment cases are an exception to this Supreme Court ruling because of the in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The Civil Rights Tax Relief amended Internal Revenue Code § 62(a) to permit taxpayers to subtract attorney's fees from gross income in arriving at adjusted gross income. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 10092 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Commissioner v. Banks, (en)
|
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-01-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:first
|
- Stephen (en)
- Jennifer L. (en)
- Leah Witcher (en)
|
| dbp:fullname
|
- v. (en)
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue (en)
- John W. Banks II (en)
- Sigitas J. Banaitis (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- When a litigant's recovery constitutes income, the litigant's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
|
| dbp:journal
|
- Baylor L. Rev. (en)
- N. Ky. L. Rev. (en)
- St. Mary's L.J. (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:last
|
- Jackson (en)
- Black (en)
- Loomis (en)
|
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Commissioner v. Banks (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:notparticipating
| |
| dbp:openjurist
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:page
|
- 47 (xsd:integer)
- 113 (xsd:integer)
- 115 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:title
|
- A Capital Gains Anomaly: Commissioner v. Banks and the Proceeds from Lawsuits (en)
- Taxation of Contingent Attorney Fees: Did the Supreme Court Correctly Decide Commissioner v. Banks? (en)
- Won the Legal Battle, but at What Tax Cost to your Client: Tax Consequences of Contingency Fee Arrangements Leading up to and after Commissioner v. Banks (en)
|
| dbp:url
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:volume
|
- 33 (xsd:integer)
- 43 (xsd:integer)
- 57 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dbp:year
|
- 2005 (xsd:integer)
- 2006 (xsd:integer)
- 2011 (xsd:integer)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whether the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a taxpayer's attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is income to the taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. The Supreme Court held when a taxpayer's recovery constitutes income, the taxpayer's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee. Employment cases are an exception to this Supreme Court ruling because of the in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The Civil Rights Tax Relief amended Internal Revenue Code § 62(a) to permit taxpayers to subtract attorney's fees from gross income in arriving at adjusted (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Commissioner v. Banks (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- v. (en)
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue (en)
- John W. Banks II (en)
- Sigitas J. Banaitis (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
