An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org:8891

Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 76, 2004 SCC 4 – known also as the spanking case – is a leading Charter decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the Court upheld section 43 of the Criminal Code that allowed for a defence of reasonable use of force by way of correction towards children as not in violation of section 7, section 12 or section 15(1) of the Charter.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 76, 2004 SCC 4 – known also as the spanking case – is a leading Charter decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the Court upheld section 43 of the Criminal Code that allowed for a defence of reasonable use of force by way of correction towards children as not in violation of section 7, section 12 or section 15(1) of the Charter. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 2137273 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7827 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1090048644 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (en)
dbp:citations
  • [2004] 1 S.C.R. 76, 2004 SCC 4 (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Binnie J. (en)
dbp:date
  • 2007-07-03 (xsd:date)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 2004-01-30 (xsd:date)
dbp:dissent
  • Deschamps J. (en)
  • Arbour J. (en)
dbp:docket
  • 29113 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Attorney General in Right of Canada (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 2003-06-06 (xsd:date)
dbp:history
  • Judgment for the Attorney General of Canada in the Court of Appeal for Ontario. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache and LeBel JJ. (en)
dbp:majority
  • McLachlin C.J. (en)
dbp:ratio
  • Section 43 of the Criminal Code does not infringe the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, provided the section is interpreted as follows: The force must be intended to actually correct the child's behaviour. The force cannot result in harm or the prospect of harm. (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal dismissed. (en)
dbp:scc
  • 2002 (xsd:integer)
dbp:url
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 76, 2004 SCC 4 – known also as the spanking case – is a leading Charter decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the Court upheld section 43 of the Criminal Code that allowed for a defence of reasonable use of force by way of correction towards children as not in violation of section 7, section 12 or section 15(1) of the Charter. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License