| dbo:abstract
|
- Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the different treatment of men and women mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 402(f)(1)(D) constituted invidious discrimination against female wage earners by affording them less protection for their surviving spouses than is provided to male employees, and therefore violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case was brought by a widower who was denied survivor benefits on the grounds that he had not been receiving at least one-half support from his wife when she died. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the court, ruling unconstitutional the provision of the Social Security Act which set forth a gender-based distinction between widows and widowers, whereby Social Security Act survivors benefits were payable to a widower only if he was receiving at least half of his support from his late wife, while such benefits based on the earnings of a deceased husband were payable to his widow regardless of dependency. The Court found that this distinction deprived female wage earners of the same protection that a similarly situated male worker would have received, violating due process and equal protection. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 12524 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-10-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Califano v. Goldfarb, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-03-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Leon Goldfarb (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- The gender-based distinction created by violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
|
- Burger, Stewart, Blackmun (en)
|
| dbp:joinplurality
|
- White, Marshall, Powell (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Califano v. Goldfarb (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:plurality
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- Goldfarb v. Sec'y of Health, Ed. & Welfare, 396 F. Supp. 308 ; probable jurisdiction noted, . (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the different treatment of men and women mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 402(f)(1)(D) constituted invidious discrimination against female wage earners by affording them less protection for their surviving spouses than is provided to male employees, and therefore violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case was brought by a widower who was denied survivor benefits on the grounds that he had not been receiving at least one-half support from his wife when she died. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the court, ruling unconstitutional the provision of the Social Security Act which set forth a gender-based distinction between widows an (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Califano v. Goldfarb (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Leon Goldfarb (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
