This HTML5 document contains 109 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n21https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/
n24https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/548/
n12https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145635/woodford-v-ngo/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n11https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n23https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n25https://www.leagle.com/decision/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n19https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/548/81/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n13https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n26https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/403/620/561382/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Prison_Litigation_Reform_Act
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo
Subject Item
dbr:Samuel_Alito
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo
Subject Item
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo
Subject Item
dbr:548_U.S._81
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo
Subject Item
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo
rdf:type
yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 dbo:Case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases umbel-rc:Event dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity owl:Thing wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Event100029378 yago:Case107308889 yago:Happening107283608
rdfs:label
Woodford v. Ngo
rdfs:comment
Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent.
foaf:name
Jeanne S. Woodford, et al., Petitioners v. Viet Mike Ngo
dcterms:subject
dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:San_Quentin_State_Prison dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_civil_procedure_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
8202403
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
895905390
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Certiorari dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:San_Quentin_State_Prison dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:Murder dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:San_Quentin_State_Prison dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:F.3d dbr:Prison dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:David_Souter dbr:Prison_Litigation_Reform_Act_of_1995 dbr:California dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:9th_Cir. dbr:Lawsuit dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1871 dbr:Samuel_Alito dbc:United_States_civil_procedure_case_law
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n12: n11:scholar_case%3Fcase=12698959200132700084 n19: n21:05-416.ZO.html n13:05-416 n25:infco20080821134 n26: n23:05-416.pdf n24:81.html
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.026w07l n17:fdmm yago-res:Woodford_v._Ngo wikidata:Q16967843
dbp:subsequent
25920.0
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist
dbp:dissent
Stevens
dbp:docket
5
dbp:joindissent
Souter, Ginsburg
dbp:joinmajority
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Prison_Litigation_Reform_Act_of_1995
dbp:oyez
n13:05-416
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
81
dbp:usvol
548
dbp:arguedate
0001-03-22
dbp:argueyear
2006
dbp:case
Woodford v. Ngo,
dbp:courtlistener
n12:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-22
dbp:decideyear
2006
dbp:findlaw
n24:81.html
dbp:fullname
Jeanne S. Woodford, et al., Petitioners v. Viet Mike Ngo
dbp:holding
The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 requirement that a prisoner exhaust any available administrative remedies before challenging prison conditions in federal court bars him from doing so not only when this first lawsuit has been lost, but also when he failed to timely brought it.
dbp:justia
n19:
dbp:litigants
Woodford v. Ngo
dbp:majority
Alito
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n23:05-416.pdf
dbo:abstract
Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case about the procedures determining when prison litigation may be commenced in federal court. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, ruled that prisoners must exhaust all state-court remedies in accordance with the rules thereof before filing claims in federal court. Justice Stephen Breyer filed a concurrence. Justice John Paul Stevens filed a dissent.
dbp:concurrence
Breyer
dbp:cornell
n21:05-416.ZO.html
dbp:googlescholar
n11:scholar_case%3Fcase=12698959200132700084
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Woodford_v._Ngo?oldid=895905390&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
6252
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Woodford_v._Ngo
Subject Item
dbr:Ross_v._Blake
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo
Subject Item
dbr:Woodford_v_Ngo
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Woodford_v._Ngo
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Woodford_v._Ngo