This HTML5 document contains 136 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n15http://supreme.justia.com/us/374/398/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n5http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/
n13https://scholar.google.com/
n19https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106660/sherbert-v-verner/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n10http://www.firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/
n18http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep374/usrep374398/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://archive.org/details/constitutionreli0000unse/page/
n23https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n22https://www.oyez.org/cases/1962/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
n14https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/374/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Entheogen
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_involving_the_First_Amendment
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Braunfeld_v._Brown
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Warren_Court
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Sherbert_v_Verner
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Sabbath_in_seventh-day_churches
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Strict_scrutiny
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Employment_Division_v._Smith
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Freedom_of_religion_in_the_United_States
rdfs:seeAlso
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Goldman_v._Weinberger
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Thomas_v._Review_Board_of_the_Indiana_Employment_Security_Division
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Lemon_v._Kurtzman
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Lyng_v._Northwest_Indian_Cemetery_Protective_Ass'n
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Thurgood_Marshall
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Warren_Court
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:West_Virginia_State_Board_of_Education_v._Barnette
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:374_U.S._398
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Test_(law)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:State_Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Acts
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Religious_exemption
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Free_Exercise_Clause
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
rdf:type
yago:Case107308889 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:LegalCase yago:Happening107283608 yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:UnitOfWork yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:Case owl:Thing wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Event100029378 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
rdfs:label
Sherbert v. Verner
rdfs:comment
Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment required the government to demonstrate both a compelling interest and that the law in question was narrowly tailored before it denied unemployment compensation to someone who was fired because her job requirements substantially conflicted with her religion.
foaf:name
Sherbert v. Verner et al., Members of South Carolina Employment Security Commission, et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:History_of_the_Seventh-day_Adventist_Church dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1963_in_United_States_case_law dbc:1963_in_religion dbc:United_States_free_exercise_of_religion_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
5437780
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1053583448
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby dbr:Braunfeld_v._Brown dbr:Unanimous_consent dbr:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act dbr:Compelling_state_interest dbr:Narrow_tailoring dbr:Religious_Land_Use_and_Institutionalized_Persons_Act dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Seventh-day_Adventist_Church dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbr:City_of_Boerne_v._Flores dbr:Controlled_Substances_Act dbr:Free_Exercise_Clause_of_the_First_Amendment dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Strict_scrutiny dbc:1963_in_United_States_case_law dbc:1963_in_religion dbr:Employment_Division_v._Smith dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Gonzales_v._O_Centro_Espírita_Beneficente_União_do_Vegetal dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Lemon_v._Kurtzman dbr:Establishment_Clause_of_the_First_Amendment dbr:Sabbath_in_Christianity dbc:United_States_free_exercise_of_religion_case_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbc:History_of_the_Seventh-day_Adventist_Church
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n5:05.html%235 n10:faq.aspx%3Fid=12923 n14:398.html n16:449 n13:scholar_case%3Fcase=17526177081953259048 n19: n15:case.html n18:usrep374398.pdf n22:526
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q7494708 n23:4uyga freebase:m.0dlwpv yago-res:Sherbert_v._Verner
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Ussc dbt:Cite_book dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:US1stAmendment
dbp:dissent
Harlan
dbp:joindissent
White
dbp:joinmajority
Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Goldberg
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:oyez
n22:526
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
172800.0
dbp:uspage
398
dbp:usvol
374
dbp:arguedate
0001-04-24
dbp:argueyear
1963
dbp:case
Sherbert v. Verner,
dbp:courtlistener
n19:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-17
dbp:decideyear
1963
dbp:findlaw
n14:398.html
dbp:fullname
Sherbert v. Verner et al., Members of South Carolina Employment Security Commission, et al.
dbp:holding
The Free Exercise Clause mandates strict scrutiny for unemployment compensation claims.
dbp:justia
n15:case.html
dbp:litigants
Sherbert v. Verner
dbp:majority
Brennan
dbp:loc
n18:usrep374398.pdf
dbo:abstract
Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment required the government to demonstrate both a compelling interest and that the law in question was narrowly tailored before it denied unemployment compensation to someone who was fired because her job requirements substantially conflicted with her religion. The case established the Sherbert Test, requiring demonstration of such a compelling interest and narrow tailoring in all Free Exercise cases in which a religious person was substantially burdened by a law. The conditions are the key components of what is usually called strict scrutiny. In 1990, the Supreme Court decided that the Sherbert Test, as a judicial constitutional analysis tool, was too broad when applied to all laws. With respect to religiously neutral, generally applicable laws that incidentally burden religious exercise, the Sherbert Test was eliminated in Employment Division v. Smith. For laws that discriminate along religious/secular lines or neutral laws that are enforced in a discriminatory way, the components of the Sherbert Test are still appropriate constitutional tools for courts to use. In response to the 1990 Smith decision, Congress created an enhanced version of the Sherbert Test as a statutory, rather than constitutional, right in the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993. Its provisions were designed to apply broadly to all laws and regulations, both federal and state. Although Congress replaced the "narrowly tailored" constitutional requirement with a "least restrictive means" statutory requirement, the enhanced test is still referred to as the Sherbert Test. However, the Supreme Court held in City of Boerne v. Flores that the law was unconstitutional because its enhanced Sherbert Test, as a purported change in constitutional rights, could not be enforced against the states. It impermissibly interfered with the judiciary's sole power to interpret the Constitution. However, the ruling did not necessarily limit its effect on interpretation of federal statutes. In 2000, Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) that applied only to federal laws. Both laws contain the same language for an even further enhanced Sherbert Test, one that broadens the definition of substantial religious burden. The Supreme Court has since relied on the statutory Sherbert Test to decide several prominent cases, including Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S. 682 (2014), and Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (2006).
dbp:concurrence
Stewart Douglas
dbp:googlescholar
n13:scholar_case%3Fcase=17526177081953259048
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Sherbert_v._Verner?oldid=1053583448&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
12322
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Sherbert
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Sherbert_Test
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
dbr:Sherbert_v_verner
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Sherbert_v._Verner
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Sherbert_v._Verner