An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 (1961), was a landmark case on the issue of religious and economic liberty decided by the United States Supreme Court. In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that a Pennsylvania blue law forbidding the sale of various retail products on Sunday was not an unconstitutional interference with religion as described in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 (1961), was a landmark case on the issue of religious and economic liberty decided by the United States Supreme Court. In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that a Pennsylvania blue law forbidding the sale of various retail products on Sunday was not an unconstitutional interference with religion as described in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 5708394 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11734 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1121173153 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-12-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1960 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Braunfeld v. Brown, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Brennan (en)
  • Frankfurter (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1961 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Douglas (en)
  • Stewart (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Abraham Braunfeld, et al. v. Brown, Commissioner of Police of Philadelphia, et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • Where the "purpose or effect of a law is to impede the observance of one or all religions or is to discriminate invidiously between religions, that law is constitutionally invalid even though the burden may be characterized as being only indirect." However, where "the State regulates conduct by enacting a general law within its power, the purpose and effect of which is to advance the State's secular goals, the statute is valid despite its indirect burden on religious observance unless the State may accomplish its purpose by means which do not impose such a burden." In this specific case, a law requiring all merchants to close on Sunday was not unconstitutional, despite indirect burdens on some Orthodox Jewish merchants. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:joinplurality
  • Black, Clark, Whittaker (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Braunfeld v. Brown (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:plurality
  • Warren (en)
dbp:prior
  • Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 599 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 366 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 (1961), was a landmark case on the issue of religious and economic liberty decided by the United States Supreme Court. In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that a Pennsylvania blue law forbidding the sale of various retail products on Sunday was not an unconstitutional interference with religion as described in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Braunfeld v. Brown (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Abraham Braunfeld, et al. v. Brown, Commissioner of Police of Philadelphia, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License