This HTML5 document contains 77 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n7https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Public_Knowledge
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Net_neutrality_law
Subject Item
dbr:Axelle_Lemaire
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Net_neutrality_law
Subject Item
dbr:Internet_Association
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Net_neutrality_law
Subject Item
dbr:Political_positions_of_Marco_Rubio
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Net_neutrality_law
Subject Item
dbr:Net_neutrality_by_country
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Net_neutrality_law
Subject Item
dbr:Net_neutrality_in_Chile
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Net_neutrality_law
Subject Item
dbr:Net_neutrality_in_the_United_States
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Net_neutrality_law
Subject Item
dbr:Net_neutrality_law
rdfs:label
Net neutrality law
rdfs:comment
Net neutrality law refers to laws and regulations which enforce the principle of net neutrality. Opponents of net neutrality enforcement claim regulation is unnecessary, because broadband service providers have no plans to block content or degrade network performance. Opponents of net neutrality regulation also argue that the best solution to discrimination by broadband providers is to encourage greater competition among such providers, which is currently limited in many areas.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Net_neutrality
dbo:wikiPageID
44677927
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1108694246
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:E-Mail_spam dbr:United_States dbr:AT&T dbr:Internet_service_provider dbr:Electromechanical dbr:Latency_(engineering) dbr:The_Weekly_Standard dbr:Save_the_Internet dbr:Comcast dbr:George_Mason_University dbr:Andy_Kessler_(author) dbr:Special_interests dbr:Susan_P._Crawford dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Municipal_broadband dbr:National_Cable_&_Telecommunications_Association_v._Brand_X_Internet_Services dbr:Almon_Brown_Strowger dbr:Wikipedia dbr:Telegraph dbr:Libertarian dbr:Open_Internet_Order dbr:Denial_of_service dbr:Facebook dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Jitter dbr:Net_neutrality_in_the_Netherlands dbr:Federal_Communications_Commission dbr:Net_neutrality_in_the_United_States dbr:BitTorrent_(protocol) dbr:Cardozo_Law_School dbr:Wall_Street_Journal dbc:Net_neutrality dbr:Net_neutrality dbr:Barack_Obama dbr:Telephone_exchange dbr:Telecommunication dbr:Troubled_Asset_Relief_Program dbr:Pacific_Telegraph_Act_of_1860 dbr:Reason_(magazine) dbr:Bram_Cohen dbr:Competition_law dbr:Tim_Wu dbr:Harvard_Law_School dbr:Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._Federal_Communications_Commission_(2014) dbr:Quality-of-service dbr:National_Security_Agency dbr:Communications_Act_of_1934 dbr:Common_carrier dbr:Eminent_domain dbr:Columbia_University_Law_School dbr:Federal_Reserve
owl:sameAs
n7:2AJrL freebase:m.012gbmnq wikidata:Q22905869
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Main dbt:Net_neutrality dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Sect-stub dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist
dbo:abstract
Net neutrality law refers to laws and regulations which enforce the principle of net neutrality. Opponents of net neutrality enforcement claim regulation is unnecessary, because broadband service providers have no plans to block content or degrade network performance. Opponents of net neutrality regulation also argue that the best solution to discrimination by broadband providers is to encourage greater competition among such providers, which is currently limited in many areas. On 23 April 2014, the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was reported to be considering a new rule that would permit Internet service providers to offer content providers a faster track to send content, thus reversing their earlier position on net neutrality. Municipal broadband could provide a net neutral environment, according to Professor Susan Crawford, a legal and technology expert at Harvard Law School. On 15 May 2014, the FCC decided to consider two options regarding Internet services: first, permit fast and slow broadband lanes, thereby compromising net neutrality; and second, reclassify broadband as a telecommunication service, thereby preserving net neutrality. On 10 November 2014, President Obama recommended the FCC reclassify broadband Internet service as a telecommunications service in order to preserve net neutrality. On 26 February 2015, the FCC ruled in favor of net neutrality by reclassifying broadband access as a telecommunications service and thus applying Title II (common carrier) of the Communications Act of 1934 to Internet service providers. On 14 December 2017, the FCC voted to repeal these net neutrality regulations, particularly by reclassifying broadband providers so that they are not considered common carries under Title II of the Communications Act of 1936.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Net_neutrality_law?oldid=1108694246&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
22957
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Net_neutrality_law
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Net_neutrality_law
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Net_neutrality_law