This HTML5 document contains 57 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n11https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Parkinson_case
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Dual_living_in_Australia
Subject Item
dbr:Dual_living_in_Australia
rdfs:label
Dual living in Australia
rdfs:comment
In Australia, the concept was proposed by the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works in 1981 to enable existing houses and housing lots to be subdivided into two to make more efficient use of existing facilities and urban infrastructure, to provide support links between the two households and to minimise external maintenance and gardening burdens. Nowadays, accessory dwelling units are increasingly being legitimized by state and local governments. These units can be a division of, addition to, or separate from the principal dwelling and are usually subject to minimum allotment sizes, site coverage, access and setback requirements. While dual properties are a fairly new concept in Australia, they have long been a common style of dwelling in countries such as Sweden, Japan and the United
dcterms:subject
dbc:Urban_planning_in_Australia
dbo:wikiPageID
68195199
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1055628292
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:United_States dbr:Household dbr:Leasehold_estate dbr:Urban_infrastructure dbr:Queensland dbr:New_South_Wales dbr:Prefabricated_building dbr:Japan dbr:Land_lot dbr:Subdivision_(land) dbr:Residential_zones dbr:Demand dbr:Capital_growth dbr:Sweden dbr:Setback_(architecture) dbr:Property_maintenance dbr:Granny_flat dbr:Metropolitan_planning_organization dbr:Australia dbr:Mortgage dbr:Dual-key_apartments dbr:Dual_occupancy dbr:Urban_planning dbr:Duplex_(building) dbr:Bank_financing dbr:Melbourne_and_Metropolitan_Board_of_Works dbr:Residential_density dbr:Residential_building dbr:Victoria_(Australia) dbr:Suburban_area dbr:Secondary_resale_market dbr:Central_Park,_Sydney dbr:Department_of_Health_(1921–1987) dbr:Rural-urban_fringe dbc:Urban_planning_in_Australia dbr:Multigenerational_living dbr:Dwelling dbr:Sydney dbr:Allotment_(gardening) dbr:Affordable_housing dbr:Accessory_dwelling_unit dbr:Amendment
owl:sameAs
n11:FtDNG wikidata:Q107630741
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Orphan dbt:Reflist
dbo:abstract
In Australia, the concept was proposed by the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works in 1981 to enable existing houses and housing lots to be subdivided into two to make more efficient use of existing facilities and urban infrastructure, to provide support links between the two households and to minimise external maintenance and gardening burdens. Nowadays, accessory dwelling units are increasingly being legitimized by state and local governments. These units can be a division of, addition to, or separate from the principal dwelling and are usually subject to minimum allotment sizes, site coverage, access and setback requirements. While dual properties are a fairly new concept in Australia, they have long been a common style of dwelling in countries such as Sweden, Japan and the United States.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Dual_living_in_Australia?oldid=1055628292&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
13302
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Dual_living_in_Australia
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Dual_living_in_Australia
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Dual_living_in_Australia