This HTML5 document contains 30 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n12https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Dissent_aversion_in_the_United_States_of_America
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Dissent_aversion
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Dissent_aversion
Subject Item
dbr:Dissent_aversion
rdf:type
dbo:Disease
rdfs:label
Dissent aversion
rdfs:comment
Dissent aversion is the judicial phenomenon that implies that judges do not like dissenting opinions in the jurisdictions where they are possible nor do they like to dissent themselves. A common example is as follows: On a panel of three judges, only one feels strongly about the decision. One of the two remaining may side with the first judge, leaving the third judge with the option of dissenting on an issue they do not feel strongly about or siding with the majority. Judges dislike dissent for many reasons. Dissent aversion can come from these sources:
dcterms:subject
dbc:Law_and_economics
dbo:wikiPageID
19169215
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
852156667
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Judge dbr:United_States_court_of_appeals dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:Majority_opinion dbr:Selection_bias dbc:Law_and_economics dbr:Cognitive_dissonance dbr:Publication_bias dbr:Confirmation_bias dbr:Collegiality
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.04ld6p0 n12:4its2 wikidata:Q5282757
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Vague
dbo:abstract
Dissent aversion is the judicial phenomenon that implies that judges do not like dissenting opinions in the jurisdictions where they are possible nor do they like to dissent themselves. A common example is as follows: On a panel of three judges, only one feels strongly about the decision. One of the two remaining may side with the first judge, leaving the third judge with the option of dissenting on an issue they do not feel strongly about or siding with the majority. Judges dislike dissent for many reasons. Dissent aversion can come from these sources: * It frays collegiality (judges have to work together in the future). * It magnifies the majority opinion. * It is additional work. * It detracts from the significance of their own majority opinions. Dissent is more frequent in US federal courts of appeals where the number of judges is higher. According to some research, this is because the larger the court, the less frequently judges must work with each other and accordingly have less incentive to extend courtesy and favors.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Phenomenon
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Dissent_aversion?oldid=852156667&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
1612
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Dissent_aversion
Subject Item
dbr:Dissenting_opinion
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Dissent_aversion
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Dissent_aversion
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Dissent_aversion