This HTML5 document contains 95 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n15https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_India
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
Subject Item
dbr:Politics_of_India
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
Subject Item
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
rdf:type
yago:Leader109623038 yago:LivingThing100004258 yago:Politician110451263 yago:Object100002684 yago:PhysicalEntity100001930 yago:Person100007846 yago:Lawgiver110249270 yago:WikicatLegislatorsInIndia yago:Organism100004475 yago:Legislator110253995 yago:CausalAgent100007347 yago:YagoLegalActor yago:YagoLegalActorGeo yago:Whole100003553
rdfs:label
Disqualification of convicted representatives in India
rdfs:comment
Supreme Court of India, in its judgement dated 10 July 2013 while disposing the Lily Thomas v. Union of India case (along with Lok Prahari v. Union of India), ruled that any Member of Parliament (MP), Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) or Member of a Legislative Council (MLC) who is convicted of a crime and given a minimum of two years' imprisonment, loses membership of the House with immediate effect. This is in contrast to the earlier position, wherein convicted members held on to their seats until they exhausted all judicial remedy in lower, state and supreme court of India. Further, Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act, which allowed elected representatives three months to appeal their conviction, was declared unconstitutional by the bench of Justice A. K. Patnaik
dcterms:subject
dbc:Indian_politicians_disqualified_from_office dbc:Indian_politicians_convicted_of_crimes dbc:Supreme_Court_of_India_cases dbc:2013_in_India
dbo:wikiPageID
40852085
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1049020231
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:RJD dbr:A._K._Patnaik dbr:Rasheed_Masood dbr:J._Jayalalithaa dbr:T._M._Selvaganapathy dbr:Supreme_Court_of_India dbr:Manmohan_Singh dbr:Bijawar_(Vidhan_Sabha_constituency) dbr:Member_of_Parliament_(India) dbr:Unconstitutional dbr:Rajya_Sabha dbr:Dravida_Munnetra_Kazhagam dbr:Ichalkaranji dbr:Rahul_Gandhi dbc:Indian_politicians_disqualified_from_office dbr:Uttar_Pradesh dbr:Jharkhand dbr:Pappu_Kalani dbr:Lily_Thomas dbr:Saran_(Lok_Sabha_constituency) dbr:Member_of_the_Legislative_Assembly_(India) dbr:All_Jharkhand_Students_Union dbc:Indian_politicians_convicted_of_crimes dbr:All_India_Anna_Dravida_Munnetra_Kazhagam dbr:Madhya_Pradesh dbr:Jahanabad_(Lok_Sabha_constituency) dbr:Asha_Rani dbr:Dr._Radhakrishnan_Nagar_(State_Assembly_Constituency) dbr:Act_of_Parliament dbr:Bihar dbr:Kapil_Sibal dbr:Lalu_Prasad_Yadav dbr:Fodder_scam dbr:Review_petition dbr:Tamil_Nadu dbr:Lok_Sabha dbr:Jagdish_Sharma dbc:Supreme_Court_of_India_cases dbc:2013_in_India dbr:Abatement_in_pleading dbr:Convicted dbr:Lohardaga_(Vidhan_Sabha_constituency) dbr:Bharatiya_Janata_Party dbr:Disproportionate_Asset_case_against_Jayalalithaa dbr:Indian_National_Congress dbr:Representation_of_the_People_Act_(India) dbr:Deolali_(Vidhan_Sabha_constituency) dbr:Kamal_Kishore_Bhagat dbr:Shiv_Sena dbr:Maharashtra dbr:S._J._Mukhopadhaya
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q15222913 yago-res:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India n15:XBgL freebase:m.0yn_3ry
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:INRConvert dbt:Reflist dbt:EngvarB dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Dts
dbo:abstract
Supreme Court of India, in its judgement dated 10 July 2013 while disposing the Lily Thomas v. Union of India case (along with Lok Prahari v. Union of India), ruled that any Member of Parliament (MP), Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) or Member of a Legislative Council (MLC) who is convicted of a crime and given a minimum of two years' imprisonment, loses membership of the House with immediate effect. This is in contrast to the earlier position, wherein convicted members held on to their seats until they exhausted all judicial remedy in lower, state and supreme court of India. Further, Section 8(4) of the Representation of the People Act, which allowed elected representatives three months to appeal their conviction, was declared unconstitutional by the bench of Justice A. K. Patnaik and Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India?oldid=1049020231&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
11545
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
Subject Item
dbr:J._Jayalalithaa
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
Subject Item
dbr:Jagdish_Sharma
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
Subject Item
dbr:By-election
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
Subject Item
dbr:Operation_Kamala
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
Subject Item
dbr:Lily_Thomas_v._Union_of_India
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Disqualification_of_convicted_representatives_in_India