This HTML5 document contains 62 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n9https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n15https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:List_of_United_Kingdom_Supreme_Court_cases
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bull_v_Hall
Subject Item
dbr:2013_Judgments_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bull_v_Hall
Subject Item
dbr:Timeline_of_LGBT_history_in_the_United_Kingdom
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bull_v_Hall
Subject Item
dbr:Bull_v_Hall
rdfs:label
Bull v Hall
rdfs:comment
Bull and another v Hall and another [2013] UKSC 73 was a Supreme Court of the United Kingdom discrimination case between Peter and Hazelmary Bull and Martin Hall and Steven Preddy. Hall and Preddy, a homosexual couple, brought the case after the Bulls refused to give them a double room in their guesthouse, citing their religious beliefs. Following appeals, the Supreme Court held the rulings of the lower courts in deciding for Hall and Preddy and against the Bulls. The court said that Preddy and Hall faced discrimination which could not be justified by the Bulls' right to religious belief. It was held that people in the United Kingdom could not justify discrimination against others on the basis of their sexual orientation due to their religious beliefs.
dcterms:subject
dbc:2013_in_British_law dbc:United_Kingdom_LGBT_rights_case_law dbc:Religious_discrimination_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbc:Law_of_the_United_Kingdom dbc:LGBT_and_religion
dbo:wikiPageID
64065315
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1082968738
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:LGBT_and_religion dbc:2013_in_British_law dbc:United_Kingdom_LGBT_rights_case_law dbr:Discrimination dbr:2013_Judgments_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbc:Religious_discrimination_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Anthony_Hughes,_Lord_Hughes_of_Ombersley dbr:LGBT_rights_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Marazion dbr:Religious_freedom dbr:County_Court dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Brian_Kerr,_Baron_Kerr_of_Tonaghmore dbr:Cornwall dbr:Brenda_Hale,_Baroness_Hale_of_Richmond dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:David_Neuberger,_Baron_Neuberger_of_Abbotsbury dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbr:Roger_Toulson,_Lord_Toulson dbr:Christian_Institute dbr:Stonewall_(charity) dbc:Law_of_the_United_Kingdom
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n15:uksc-2012-0065-judgment.pdf
owl:sameAs
n9:Bw2bA wikidata:Q96374105
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Short_description dbt:Portal dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_UKSC_case
dbp:arguedate
0001-10-10
dbp:argueyear
2013
dbp:court
dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
dbp:decidedate
0001-11-27
dbp:decideyear
2013
dbp:fullname
Bull and another v Hall and another
dbp:holding
Religious beliefs cannot be used to justify discrimination based on sexual orientation
dbp:litigants
Bull v Hall
dbp:majority
Lady Hale
dbo:abstract
Bull and another v Hall and another [2013] UKSC 73 was a Supreme Court of the United Kingdom discrimination case between Peter and Hazelmary Bull and Martin Hall and Steven Preddy. Hall and Preddy, a homosexual couple, brought the case after the Bulls refused to give them a double room in their guesthouse, citing their religious beliefs. Following appeals, the Supreme Court held the rulings of the lower courts in deciding for Hall and Preddy and against the Bulls. The court said that Preddy and Hall faced discrimination which could not be justified by the Bulls' right to religious belief. It was held that people in the United Kingdom could not justify discrimination against others on the basis of their sexual orientation due to their religious beliefs.
dbp:areaOfLaw
dbr:Religious_freedom dbr:Discrimination
dbp:neutralCitation
[2013] UKSC 73
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Bull_v_Hall?oldid=1082968738&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
6839
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Bull_v_Hall
Subject Item
dbr:Bull_and_another_v_Hall_and_another
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Bull_v_Hall
dbo:wikiPageRedirects
dbr:Bull_v_Hall
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Bull_v_Hall
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Bull_v_Hall