An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

White-Smith Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company, 209 U.S. 1 (1908), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that manufacturers of music rolls for player pianos did not have to pay royalties to the composers. The ruling was based on a holding that the piano rolls were not copies of the plaintiffs' copyrighted sheet music, but were instead parts of the machine that reproduced the music.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • White-Smith Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company, 209 U.S. 1 (1908), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that manufacturers of music rolls for player pianos did not have to pay royalties to the composers. The ruling was based on a holding that the piano rolls were not copies of the plaintiffs' copyrighted sheet music, but were instead parts of the machine that reproduced the music. This case was subsequently eclipsed by Congress's intervention in the form of an amendment to the Copyright Act of 1909, introducing a compulsory license for the manufacture and distribution of such "mechanical" embodiments of musical works. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 1937722 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6711 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1018415932 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedatea
  • 0001-01-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:arguedateb
  • 17 (xsd:integer)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1908 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co., (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Holmes (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1908 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • White-Smith Music Publishing Company, Appt., v. Apollo Company (en)
dbp:holding
  • Music rolls for pianos do not require royalty payments because sheet music copyrights do not cover mechanical parts. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • White-Smith Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Day (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 28 (xsd:integer)
dbp:superseded
dbp:uspage
  • 1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 209 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • White-Smith Music Publishing Company v. Apollo Company, 209 U.S. 1 (1908), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that manufacturers of music rolls for player pianos did not have to pay royalties to the composers. The ruling was based on a holding that the piano rolls were not copies of the plaintiffs' copyrighted sheet music, but were instead parts of the machine that reproduced the music. (en)
rdfs:label
  • White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • White-Smith Music Publishing Company, Appt., v. Apollo Company (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License