About: Warden v. Hayden

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that 'mere evidence' may be seized and held as evidence in a trial, allowing such evidence obtained in a search to be used. This finding reversed previous Supreme Court decisions such as Boyd v. United States which had held that search warrants may not be used as a means of gaining access to a man's house or office and papers solely for the purpose of making search to secure evidence to be used against him in a criminal or penal proceeding...

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that 'mere evidence' may be seized and held as evidence in a trial, allowing such evidence obtained in a search to be used. This finding reversed previous Supreme Court decisions such as Boyd v. United States which had held that search warrants may not be used as a means of gaining access to a man's house or office and papers solely for the purpose of making search to secure evidence to be used against him in a criminal or penal proceeding... (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep387/usrep387294/usrep387294.pdf https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/387/294.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/363/647/264256/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/294/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1966/480
dbo:wikiPageID	22865846 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	4216 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1122219213 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Bench_trial dbr:F.2d dbr:Mere_evidence_rule dbr:Boyd_v._United_States dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_387 dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Appeals dbr:Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree dbr:Hot_pursuit dbr:4th_Cir. dbr:Evidence_(law) dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:1967_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Certiorari dbr:Gouled_v._United_States
dbp:arguedate	0001-04-12 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1967 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Warden v. Hayden, (en)
dbp:concurrence	Black (en) Fortas (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-05-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1967 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Douglas (en)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/387/294.html
dbp:fullname	Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden (en)
dbp:holding	The distinction prohibiting seizure of items of only evidential value and allowing seizure of instrumentalities, fruits, or contraband is no longer accepted as being required by the Fourth Amendment (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence	Warren (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Clark, Harlan, Stewart, White (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/294/
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants	Warden v. Hayden (en)
dbp:loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep387/usrep387294/usrep387294.pdf
dbp:majority	Brennan (en)
dbp:overturnedPreviousCase	Gouled v. United States (en)
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1966/480
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	17280.0
dbp:subsequent	Conviction upheld (en)
dbp:uspage	294 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	387 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:US4thAmendment
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1967_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that 'mere evidence' may be seized and held as evidence in a trial, allowing such evidence obtained in a search to be used. This finding reversed previous Supreme Court decisions such as Boyd v. United States which had held that search warrants may not be used as a means of gaining access to a man's house or office and papers solely for the purpose of making search to secure evidence to be used against him in a criminal or penal proceeding... (en)
rdfs:label	Warden v. Hayden (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Warden v. Hayden wikidata:Warden v. Hayden https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4xMQ6 yago-res:Warden v. Hayden
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Warden_v._Hayden?oldid=1122219213&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Warden_v._Hayden
foaf:name	(en) Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:387_U.S._294 dbr:Warden,_Maryland_Penitentiary_v._Hayden dbr:Warden,_Md._Penitentiary_v._Hayden dbr:Warden,_Md._Penitentiary_v_Hayden dbr:Warden_v_Hayden
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Hot_pursuit dbr:387_U.S._294 dbr:Earl_Warren dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Warden,_Maryland_Penitentiary_v._Hayden dbr:Warden,_Md._Penitentiary_v._Hayden dbr:Warden,_Md._Penitentiary_v_Hayden dbr:Warden_v_Hayden
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Warden_v._Hayden