An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669 (1973), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the members of SCRAP—five law students from the George Washington University Law School—had standing to sue under Article III of the Constitution to challenge a nationwide railroad freight rate increase approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). SCRAP was the first full-court consideration of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Court also reversed the lower court decision that an injunction should be issued at the suspension stage of the ICC rate proceeding. The standing decision has retained its place as the high mark in the Court's standing jurisprudence.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669 (1973), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the members of SCRAP—five law students from the George Washington University Law School—had standing to sue under Article III of the Constitution to challenge a nationwide railroad freight rate increase approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). SCRAP was the first full-court consideration of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Court also reversed the lower court decision that an injunction should be issued at the suspension stage of the ICC rate proceeding. The standing decision has retained its place as the high mark in the Court's standing jurisprudence. (en)
  • 미국 대 SCRAP 사건(United States v. SCRAP(Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures) 412 U.S. 669 (1973))은 미국 연방대법원의 유명판례이다. (ko)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 13451123 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 24400 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1089593839 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-02-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1973 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Blackmun (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent
  • Marshall (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-18 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1973 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Douglas (en)
  • White (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • United States, et al. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures , et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Article III "case or controversy" requirement of standing to sue met by members of SCRAP who alleged harm from the adverse effects of a 2.5 percent across-the-board nationwide railroad freight rate increase on materials capable of being recycled approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission . The Court also concluded that, at such an early stage in the ICC rate-making process, the preliminary injunction enjoining the collection of such freight rates must be set aside pending the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Brennan (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Burger, Rehnquist (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Brennan, Blackmun; Douglas, Marshall ; Burger, White, Rehnquist (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 2; National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.; Interstate Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. 7 (en)
dbp:litigants
  • United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Stewart (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Powell (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:prior
  • Case referred by United States District Court to Three Judge Court ; preliminary injunction issued, 346 F. Supp. 189 ; stay denied , ; probable jurisdiction noted, (en)
dbp:subsequent
  • 371 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 669 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 412 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), 412 U.S. 669 (1973), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the members of SCRAP—five law students from the George Washington University Law School—had standing to sue under Article III of the Constitution to challenge a nationwide railroad freight rate increase approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). SCRAP was the first full-court consideration of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Court also reversed the lower court decision that an injunction should be issued at the suspension stage of the ICC rate proceeding. The standing decision has retained its place as the high mark in the Court's standing jurisprudence. (en)
  • 미국 대 SCRAP 사건(United States v. SCRAP(Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures) 412 U.S. 669 (1973))은 미국 연방대법원의 유명판례이다. (ko)
rdfs:label
  • 미국 대 SCRAP 사건 (ko)
  • United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States, et al. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP), et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License