An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. The court ruled that the United States government cannot deprive the people of constitutional rights - in this case, freedom of association - even in the interests of national security. The Court found the McCarran Internal Security Act violates the defendant's right to free association that is guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. The court ruled that the United States government cannot deprive the people of constitutional rights - in this case, freedom of association - even in the interests of national security. The petitioner, Eugene Frank Robel, who worked at Todd Shipyards in Seattle, was indicted on May 21, 1963, for being a member of the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA) and thus affiliated with it, without being registered with the Subversive Activities Control Board in violation of the McCarran Internal Security Act section 5 (a) (I) (D). Since the act required CPUSA to register as a Communist Party, he was told because of his affiliation with the Party, he also had to register as well, and that he could no longer work at the shipyard because of his affiliation with the Communist Party; Todd Shipyards had been designated a "defense" facility, otherwise known as federal employment, which was illegal under the McCarran Act. Robel appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court. The Court found the McCarran Internal Security Act violates the defendant's right to free association that is guaranteed by the First Amendment. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 10537922 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2810 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1063660356 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1966 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • United States v. Robel, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Brennan (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-12-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1967 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • White (en)
dbp:fullname
  • United States v. Robel (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • The United States government cannot deprive the people of constitutional rights, even in the interests of national security (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Black, Douglas, Stewart, Fortas (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • United States v. Robel (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Warren (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Marshall (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 258 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 389 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. The court ruled that the United States government cannot deprive the people of constitutional rights - in this case, freedom of association - even in the interests of national security. The Court found the McCarran Internal Security Act violates the defendant's right to free association that is guaranteed by the First Amendment. (en)
rdfs:label
  • United States v. Robel (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States v. Robel (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License