About: United States v. Gouveia

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. Gouveia, 467 U.S. 180 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that prisoners in administrative segregation pending the investigation of crimes committed within the prison had no Sixth Amendment entitlement to counsel prior to the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings against them. In an opinion written by Justice William Rehnquist, the Court stated that the right to counsel may extend to "'critical' pretrial proceedings" that are adversarial in nature, but the Sixth Amendment right to counsel "attaches at the initiation of adversary judicial criminal proceedings".

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	United States v. Gouveia, 467 U.S. 180 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that prisoners in administrative segregation pending the investigation of crimes committed within the prison had no Sixth Amendment entitlement to counsel prior to the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings against them. In an opinion written by Justice William Rehnquist, the Court stated that the right to counsel may extend to "'critical' pretrial proceedings" that are adversarial in nature, but the Sixth Amendment right to counsel "attaches at the initiation of adversary judicial criminal proceedings". (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/467/180.html
dbo:wikiPageID	2410866 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	2653 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	895903950 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Prison dbc:1984_in_United_States_case_law dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_467 dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_U.S._Constitution dbr:William_Rehnquist dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_appointment_of_counsel_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume dbr:Associate_Justice_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-03-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1984 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	United States v. Gouveia, 467 U.S. 180 , (en)
dbp:concurrence	Stevens (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-05-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1984 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Marshall (en)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/467/180.html
dbp:fullname	United States v. William Gouveia, et al. (en)
dbp:holding	Respondents were not constitutionally entitled to the appointment of counsel while they were in administrative segregation and before any adversary judicial proceedings had been initiated against them. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence	Brennan (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, O'Connor (en)
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants	United States v. Gouveia (en)
dbp:majority	Rehnquist (en)
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	Cert. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (en)
dbp:uspage	180 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	467 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist
dcterms:subject	dbc:1984_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_appointment_of_counsel_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	United States v. Gouveia, 467 U.S. 180 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that prisoners in administrative segregation pending the investigation of crimes committed within the prison had no Sixth Amendment entitlement to counsel prior to the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings against them. In an opinion written by Justice William Rehnquist, the Court stated that the right to counsel may extend to "'critical' pretrial proceedings" that are adversarial in nature, but the Sixth Amendment right to counsel "attaches at the initiation of adversary judicial criminal proceedings". (en)
rdfs:label	United States v. Gouveia (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:United States v. Gouveia yago-res:United States v. Gouveia wikidata:United States v. Gouveia https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4x14n
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Gouveia?oldid=895903950&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Gouveia
foaf:name	(en) United States v. William Gouveia, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:U.S._v._Gouveia dbr:467_U.S._180 dbr:467_US_180 dbr:United_States_v._Gouveja dbr:United_States_v_Gouveia
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Burger_Court dbr:U.S._v._Gouveia dbr:467_U.S._180 dbr:467_US_180 dbr:United_States_v._Gouveja dbr:United_States_v_Gouveia
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Gouveia