An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the respondent's forcible abduction from a foreign country, despite the existence of an extradition treaty with said country, does not prohibit him from being tried before a U.S. court for violations of American criminal laws. The ruling reconfirmed the Ker-Frisbie Doctrine, established in Ker v. Illinois (1886) and Frisbie v. Collins (1952), which generally permits the prosecution of criminal defendants regardless of whether their presence was obtained in accordance with an applicable extradition treaty.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the respondent's forcible abduction from a foreign country, despite the existence of an extradition treaty with said country, does not prohibit him from being tried before a U.S. court for violations of American criminal laws. The ruling reconfirmed the Ker-Frisbie Doctrine, established in Ker v. Illinois (1886) and Frisbie v. Collins (1952), which generally permits the prosecution of criminal defendants regardless of whether their presence was obtained in accordance with an applicable extradition treaty. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 1242422 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6288 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1093328671 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-04-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1992 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • United States v. Alvarez-Machain, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1992 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • United States of America v. Humberto Alvarez-Machain (en)
dbp:holding
  • The fact of respondent's forcible abduction from another country does not prohibit his trial in a United States court for violations of American criminal laws. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Blackmun, O'Connor (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • White, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • United States v. Alvarez-Machain (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:subsequent
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 655 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 504 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the respondent's forcible abduction from a foreign country, despite the existence of an extradition treaty with said country, does not prohibit him from being tried before a U.S. court for violations of American criminal laws. The ruling reconfirmed the Ker-Frisbie Doctrine, established in Ker v. Illinois (1886) and Frisbie v. Collins (1952), which generally permits the prosecution of criminal defendants regardless of whether their presence was obtained in accordance with an applicable extradition treaty. (en)
rdfs:label
  • United States v. Alvarez-Machain (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • United States of America v. Humberto Alvarez-Machain (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License