About: Tyler v. Cain

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S. 656 (2001) is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the rule established under Cage v. Louisiana (1990), where the Court held certain jury instructions unconstitutional because the words used did not suggest the degree of proof required by the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, was not "made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court." Tyler is the primary case regarding the retroactivity of new rules to successive habeas petitions.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S. 656 (2001) is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the rule established under Cage v. Louisiana (1990), where the Court held certain jury instructions unconstitutional because the words used did not suggest the degree of proof required by the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, was not "made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court." Tyler is the primary case regarding the retroactivity of new rules to successive habeas petitions. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-5961.ZS.html https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=5177&context=flr%7Cjournal=Fordham https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php%3FID=852002002112007096065103022086121071121046022072028063018098019109095023067124119096001012057097017112026090001029065071124026021001010026044018020090002077085125067050075064105011081019023096069109120093101025098083075088098094089020012022081070106&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE%7Cpublisher=American https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/232681018.pdf%7Cjournal=Akron https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/533/656/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000/00-5961 https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=1481&context=wlucdj%7Cjournal=Capital
dbo:wikiPageID	66241447 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	13044 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1122977631 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Sandra_Day_O'Connor dbr:Prima_facie dbr:David_Souter dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_Louisiana dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Antiterrorism_and_Effective_Death_Penalty_Act_of_1996 dbr:Louisiana_Supreme_Court dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:2000_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Clarence_Thomas dbr:2000_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Sandra_Day_O'Connor dbr:2000_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Stephen_Breyer dbr:2000_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbc:2001_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Jury_instructions dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Reasonable_doubt dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:Habeas_corpus dbr:Teague_v._Lane dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Post_conviction dbr:Certiorari
dbp:arguedate	0001-04-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2001 (xsd:integer)
dbp:concurrence	O'Connor (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-06-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2001 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Breyer (en)
dbp:docket	0 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Tyler v. Cain, Warden (en)
dbp:holding	The rule established under Cage v. Louisiana , where the court held certain jury instructions unconstitutional because the words used did not suggest the degree of proof required by the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, was not "made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court." (en)
dbp:joindissent	Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy (en)
dbp:lawsapplied	Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (en)
dbp:litigants	Tyler v. Cain (en)
dbp:majority	Thomas (en)
dbp:opinionannouncement	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000/00-5961
dbp:oralargument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000/00-5961
dbp:parallelcitations	121 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage	656 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	533 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Cite_web dbt:Refbegin dbt:Refend dbt:Reflist dbt:Sfn dbt:Sfnref dbt:Infobox_US_Supreme_Court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:2001_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S. 656 (2001) is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the rule established under Cage v. Louisiana (1990), where the Court held certain jury instructions unconstitutional because the words used did not suggest the degree of proof required by the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, was not "made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court." Tyler is the primary case regarding the retroactivity of new rules to successive habeas petitions. (en)
rdfs:label	Tyler v. Cain (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:Tyler v. Cain https://global.dbpedia.org/id/FYbQJ
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Tyler_v._Cain?oldid=1122977631&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Tyler_v._Cain
foaf:name	Tyler v. Cain, Warden (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Tyler_v_Cain
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Tyler_v_Cain
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Tyler_v._Cain