About: Thing v. La Chusa

An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal. 3d 644 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that limited the scope of the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress. The majority opinion was authored by Associate Justice David Eagleson, and it is regarded as his single most famous opinion and representative of his conservative judicial philosophy.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal. 3d 644 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that limited the scope of the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress. The majority opinion was authored by Associate Justice David Eagleson, and it is regarded as his single most famous opinion and representative of his conservative judicial philosophy. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=4005949371237649225&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
dbo:wikiPageID	24697360 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	4795 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1111670929 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:Negligence_case_law dbr:David_Eagleson dbr:Duty_of_care dbc:1989_in_California dbc:1989_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Edward_A._Panelli dbr:Molien_v._Kaiser_Foundation_Hospitals dbr:Stanley_Mosk dbr:Tort dbr:Allen_Broussard dbc:California_state_case_law dbc:United_States_tort_case_law dbr:Bright-line_rule dbr:Dillon_v._Legg dbr:Legal_case dbr:Archibald_v._Braverman dbr:John_Arguelles dbr:Supreme_Court_of_California dbr:Marcus_Kaufman dbr:Krouse_v._Graham dbr:Case_citation dbr:Majority_opinion dbr:Negligent_infliction_of_emotional_distress dbr:Summary_judgment dbr:Malcolm_M._Lucas dbr:Foreseeability
dbp:associatejudges	dbr:David_Eagleson dbr:Edward_A._Panelli dbr:Stanley_Mosk dbr:Allen_Broussard dbr:John_Arguelles dbr:Marcus_Kaufman
dbp:chiefjudge	dbr:Malcolm_M._Lucas
dbp:citations	57 (xsd:integer) 257 (xsd:integer) 17280.0
dbp:concurrence	Kaufman (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-04-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1989 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Broussard (en) Mosk (en)
dbp:fullname	Maria E. Thing v. James V. La Chusa (en)
dbp:holding	A bystander can only recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress if they are closely related to the victim, are present and aware of the injury, and suffer emotional distress as a result. (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Lucas, Panelli, Arguelles (en)
dbp:litigants	Thing v. La Chusa (en)
dbp:majority	Eagleson (en)
dbp:prior	233 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Law_report dbt:Infobox_California_Supreme_Court_case dbt:United_States_tort_case_law
dcterms:subject	dbc:Negligence_case_law dbc:1989_in_California dbc:1989_in_United_States_case_law dbc:California_state_case_law dbc:United_States_tort_case_law
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:comment	Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal. 3d 644 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that limited the scope of the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress. The majority opinion was authored by Associate Justice David Eagleson, and it is regarded as his single most famous opinion and representative of his conservative judicial philosophy. (en)
rdfs:label	Thing v. La Chusa (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Thing v. La Chusa wikidata:Thing v. La Chusa https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4wUGe
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Thing_v._La_Chusa?oldid=1111670929&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Thing_v._La_Chusa
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:48_Cal._3d_644
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:David_Eagleson dbr:Edward_A._Panelli dbr:Aeroméxico_Flight_498 dbr:Dillon_v._Legg dbr:Archibald_v._Braverman dbr:Supreme_Court_of_California dbr:Krouse_v._Graham dbr:Negligent_infliction_of_emotional_distress dbr:48_Cal._3d_644
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Thing_v._La_Chusa