About: State v. Quattlebaum

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

State v Quattlebaum (338 S.C. 441, 527 S.E.2d 105) is a 2000 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court. The case is notable for having established the precedent that a defendant may, with restrictions, call the prosecuting attorney as a witness.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	State v Quattlebaum (338 S.C. 441, 527 S.E.2d 105) is a 2000 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court. The case is notable for having established the precedent that a defendant may, with restrictions, call the prosecuting attorney as a witness. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID	39076771 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	3387 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1088069230 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Precedent dbc:United_States_state_evidence_case_law dbc:2000_in_South_Carolina dbr:Polygraph dbr:Prosecuting_attorney dbr:Admissible_evidence dbc:South_Carolina_state_case_law dbc:United_States_attorney–client_privilege_case_law dbr:E._C._Burnett_III dbr:Capital_murder dbr:Judgment_(law) dbr:Privilege_(evidence) dbr:James_E._Moore_(judge) dbr:Jean_H._Toal dbc:2000_in_United_States_case_law dbr:John_H._Waller_(judge) dbr:South_Carolina_Supreme_Court dbr:Witness
dbp:citations	17280.0
dbp:concurring	Toal, Moore, Waller, Howell (en)
dbp:court	dbr:South_Carolina_Supreme_Court
dbp:dateDecided	2000-01-24 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy	Burnett (en)
dbp:fullName	The State of South Carolina, Respondent, v. Robert Joseph Quattlebaum, Appellant. (en)
dbp:judges	Jean H. Toal, James E. Moore, John H. Waller, E. C. Burnett III, William T. Howell (en)
dbp:keywords	dbr:Admissible_evidence dbr:Witness (en)
dbp:name	State v. Quattlebaum (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges	5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Efn dbt:Notelist dbt:Reflist dbt:Start_date dbt:Infobox_court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_state_evidence_case_law dbc:2000_in_South_Carolina dbc:South_Carolina_state_case_law dbc:United_States_attorney–client_privilege_case_law dbc:2000_in_United_States_case_law
gold:hypernym	dbr:Decision
rdf:type	dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	State v Quattlebaum (338 S.C. 441, 527 S.E.2d 105) is a 2000 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court. The case is notable for having established the precedent that a defendant may, with restrictions, call the prosecuting attorney as a witness. (en)
rdfs:label	State v. Quattlebaum (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:State v. Quattlebaum wikidata:State v. Quattlebaum https://global.dbpedia.org/id/fZGE
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:State_v._Quattlebaum?oldid=1088069230&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:State_v._Quattlebaum
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:State_v_Quattlebaum dbr:State_v_quattlebaum
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:State_v_Quattlebaum dbr:State_v_quattlebaum
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:State_v._Quattlebaum