dbo:abstract
|
- Spano v. New York, 360 U.S. 315 (1959), represented the Supreme Court's movement away from the amorphous voluntariness standard for determining whether police violated due process standards when eliciting confessions and towards the modern rule in Miranda v. Arizona. In Spano, the Court focused less on factors such as meals provided to the accused and more on whether the accused had access to legal counsel. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 5392 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-04-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
| |
dbp:concurrence
|
- Douglas (en)
- Stewart (en)
|
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:findlaw
| |
dbp:fullname
| |
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- The Court held that the interrogation violated Spano's 14th Amendment due process rights because Spano's confession was not voluntary. (en)
|
dbp:joinconcurrence
|
- Douglas, Brennan (en)
- Black, Brennan (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
| |
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dct:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Spano v. New York, 360 U.S. 315 (1959), represented the Supreme Court's movement away from the amorphous voluntariness standard for determining whether police violated due process standards when eliciting confessions and towards the modern rule in Miranda v. Arizona. In Spano, the Court focused less on factors such as meals provided to the accused and more on whether the accused had access to legal counsel. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Spano v. New York (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |