An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Spano v. New York, 360 U.S. 315 (1959), represented the Supreme Court's movement away from the amorphous voluntariness standard for determining whether police violated due process standards when eliciting confessions and towards the modern rule in Miranda v. Arizona. In Spano, the Court focused less on factors such as meals provided to the accused and more on whether the accused had access to legal counsel.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Spano v. New York, 360 U.S. 315 (1959), represented the Supreme Court's movement away from the amorphous voluntariness standard for determining whether police violated due process standards when eliciting confessions and towards the modern rule in Miranda v. Arizona. In Spano, the Court focused less on factors such as meals provided to the accused and more on whether the accused had access to legal counsel. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 14583032 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 5392 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1026171328 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-04-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1959 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Spano v. New York, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Douglas (en)
  • Stewart (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1959 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Spano v. New York (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • The Court held that the interrogation violated Spano's 14th Amendment due process rights because Spano's confession was not voluntary. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Douglas, Brennan (en)
  • Black, Brennan (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Spano v. New York (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Warren (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:uspage
  • 315 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 360 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Spano v. New York, 360 U.S. 315 (1959), represented the Supreme Court's movement away from the amorphous voluntariness standard for determining whether police violated due process standards when eliciting confessions and towards the modern rule in Miranda v. Arizona. In Spano, the Court focused less on factors such as meals provided to the accused and more on whether the accused had access to legal counsel. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Spano v. New York (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Spano v. New York (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License