An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), was a U.S. Supreme Court Case in which Silverthorne attempted to evade paying taxes. Federal agents illegally seized tax books from Silverthorne and created copies of the records. The issue in this case is whether or not derivatives of illegal evidence are permissible in court. The ruling, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., was that to permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible. This precedent later became known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine," and is an extension of the exclusionary rule.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), adalah sebuah perkara di Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat. Dalam perkara ini, Silverthorne mencoba mengemplang pajak, dan agen-agen federal kemudian menyita buku pajak Silverthorne dan membuat salinan buku tersebut. Pertanyaan utama dalam perkara ini adalah, apakah turunan dari bukti yang diperoleh secara ilegal dapat diterima oleh pengadilan. Mahkamah Agung lalu mengeluarkan putusan yang disampaikan oleh Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. yang menyatakan bahwa jika turunan dari bukti yang ilegal diizinkan, maka polisi akan terdorong untuk melanggar Amendemen Keempat Konstitusi Amerika Serikat, sehingga salinan bukti ilegal dianggap telah "tercemar" dan tidak dapat diterima oleh pengadilan. Putusan ini lalu dikenal sebagai doktrin "buah pohon beracun". Hakim White dan Pitney tidak setuju dengan keputusan ini, tetapi tidak mengeluarkan pendapat berbeda. (in)
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), was a U.S. Supreme Court Case in which Silverthorne attempted to evade paying taxes. Federal agents illegally seized tax books from Silverthorne and created copies of the records. The issue in this case is whether or not derivatives of illegal evidence are permissible in court. The ruling, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., was that to permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible. This precedent later became known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine," and is an extension of the exclusionary rule. Chief Justice White and Associate Justice Pitney dissented without a written opinion. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 10896383 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3592 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1110837233 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-12-12 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1919 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-01-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1920 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • White (en)
  • Pitney (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co., Inc., et al. v. United States (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • To permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible. (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Holmes, joined by McKenna, Day, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Clark (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 40 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 385 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 251 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), adalah sebuah perkara di Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat. Dalam perkara ini, Silverthorne mencoba mengemplang pajak, dan agen-agen federal kemudian menyita buku pajak Silverthorne dan membuat salinan buku tersebut. Pertanyaan utama dalam perkara ini adalah, apakah turunan dari bukti yang diperoleh secara ilegal dapat diterima oleh pengadilan. Mahkamah Agung lalu mengeluarkan putusan yang disampaikan oleh Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. yang menyatakan bahwa jika turunan dari bukti yang ilegal diizinkan, maka polisi akan terdorong untuk melanggar Amendemen Keempat Konstitusi Amerika Serikat, sehingga salinan bukti ilegal dianggap telah "tercemar" dan tidak dapat diterima oleh pengadilan. Putusan ini lalu dikenal sebagai doktrin "buah (in)
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), was a U.S. Supreme Court Case in which Silverthorne attempted to evade paying taxes. Federal agents illegally seized tax books from Silverthorne and created copies of the records. The issue in this case is whether or not derivatives of illegal evidence are permissible in court. The ruling, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., was that to permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible. This precedent later became known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine," and is an extension of the exclusionary rule. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States (in)
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Silverthorne Lumber Co., Inc., et al. v. United States (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License