An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff, 553 U.S. 571 (2008), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States evaluated standards for awarding attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. After it prevailed in a lawsuit for back wages, Richlin filed an application for reimbursement of fees and expenses from the lawsuit, including 523.8 hours of paralegal work. Richlin requested the paralegal fees at the market rate for the services, rather than at the cost to the law firm that represented Richlin. The Department of Transportation’s Board of Contract Appeals ruled that recovery of fees should be limited to the cost to the attorneys, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board's determination. In an opinion written by Justice Samuel

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff, 553 U.S. 571 (2008), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States evaluated standards for awarding attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. After it prevailed in a lawsuit for back wages, Richlin filed an application for reimbursement of fees and expenses from the lawsuit, including 523.8 hours of paralegal work. Richlin requested the paralegal fees at the market rate for the services, rather than at the cost to the law firm that represented Richlin. The Department of Transportation’s Board of Contract Appeals ruled that recovery of fees should be limited to the cost to the attorneys, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board's determination. In an opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court held that parties are entitled to reimbursement for services at prevailing market rates. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 24214510 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3512 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1026034359 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2008 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2008 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 6 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • v (en)
  • Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security (en)
  • Richlin Security Service Company, petitioner (en)
dbp:holding
  • 259200.0
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer; Scalia ; Thomas (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff (en)
dbp:majority
  • Alito (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 571 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 553 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff, 553 U.S. 571 (2008), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States evaluated standards for awarding attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. After it prevailed in a lawsuit for back wages, Richlin filed an application for reimbursement of fees and expenses from the lawsuit, including 523.8 hours of paralegal work. Richlin requested the paralegal fees at the market rate for the services, rather than at the cost to the law firm that represented Richlin. The Department of Transportation’s Board of Contract Appeals ruled that recovery of fees should be limited to the cost to the attorneys, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board's determination. In an opinion written by Justice Samuel (en)
rdfs:label
  • Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • v (en)
  • Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security (en)
  • Richlin Security Service Company, petitioner (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License