About: R v Suberu

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

R v Suberu 2009 SCC 33 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on section 9 and section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court applied the new test for detention created in the companion case of R v Grant and ruled on the timing of when an individual is required to be informed of his or her rights to counsel after being arrested or detained.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • R. c. Suberu est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 2009 sur les articles 9 et 10 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. La Cour a appliqué le nouveau critère de détention créé dans l'affaire connexe R c. Grant et a statué sur le moment auquel une personne doit être informée de ses droits à l'assistance d'un avocat après avoir été arrêtée ou détenue. (fr)
  • R v Suberu 2009 SCC 33 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on section 9 and section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court applied the new test for detention created in the companion case of R v Grant and ruled on the timing of when an individual is required to be informed of his or her rights to counsel after being arrested or detained. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 25292855 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11783 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1058767971 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • R v Suberu (en)
dbp:citations
  • 2009 (xsd:integer)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 2009-07-17 (xsd:date)
dbp:dissent
  • Fish J. (en)
  • Binnie J. (en)
dbp:docket
  • 31912 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Musibau Suberu v Her Majesty The Queen (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 2008-04-15 (xsd:date)
dbp:history
  • Judgment for the Crown in the Court of Appeal for Ontario. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • LeBel, Deschamps, Abella JJ. (en)
dbp:majority
  • McLachlin C.J. and Charon J. (en)
dbp:ratio
  • Not every interaction with the police is a detention, and police are allowed to interact with members of the public without having to have specific grounds connecting the individual to the commission of a crime. (en)
  • "Without delay" in s. 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms regarding being informed of rights to counsel after arrest or detention means "immediately", subject to officer safety and limitations prescribed by law and justified under s. 1 of the Charter. (en)
dbp:ruling
  • appeal dismissed (en)
dbp:scc
  • 2008 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • R. c. Suberu est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 2009 sur les articles 9 et 10 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. La Cour a appliqué le nouveau critère de détention créé dans l'affaire connexe R c. Grant et a statué sur le moment auquel une personne doit être informée de ses droits à l'assistance d'un avocat après avoir été arrêtée ou détenue. (fr)
  • R v Suberu 2009 SCC 33 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on section 9 and section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court applied the new test for detention created in the companion case of R v Grant and ruled on the timing of when an individual is required to be informed of his or her rights to counsel after being arrested or detained. (en)
rdfs:label
  • R. c. Suberu (fr)
  • R v Suberu (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License