About: R v Duarte

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

R v Duarte, [1990] 1 SCR 30 is a leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to privacy under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"). The Court held that a warrantless and surreptitious video recording of private communications violated section 8. Consent of only one party to a conversation is insufficient to be reasonable.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • R v Duarte, [1990] 1 SCR 30 is a leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to privacy under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"). The Court held that a warrantless and surreptitious video recording of private communications violated section 8. Consent of only one party to a conversation is insufficient to be reasonable. (en)
  • 女皇訴杜阿爾特案（英語：R v Duarte，[1990] 1 SCR 30）是加拿大最高法院根據《加拿大權利與自由憲章》第8條就私隱權作出決定的主要案件。法院認為，無手令且秘密錄製私人通訊的影片違反了第8條。對話中只有一方的同意不足以成為合理的。 (zh)
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 7360906 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2833 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 955299873 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • R v Duarte (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1990] 1 SCR 30 (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Lamer J (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1990-01-25 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Mario Duarte v Her Majesty The Queen (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 0001-10-04 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:history
  • appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Dickson CJ and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier and McLachlin JJ (en)
dbp:majority
  • La Forest J (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Duarte appeal dismissed (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1989 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • R v Duarte, [1990] 1 SCR 30 is a leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to privacy under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"). The Court held that a warrantless and surreptitious video recording of private communications violated section 8. Consent of only one party to a conversation is insufficient to be reasonable. (en)
  • 女皇訴杜阿爾特案（英語：R v Duarte，[1990] 1 SCR 30）是加拿大最高法院根據《加拿大權利與自由憲章》第8條就私隱權作出決定的主要案件。法院認為，無手令且秘密錄製私人通訊的影片違反了第8條。對話中只有一方的同意不足以成為合理的。 (zh)
rdfs:label
  • R v Duarte (en)
  • 女皇訴杜阿爾特案 (zh)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License