About: R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

R (Reilly and Wilson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] UKSC 68 is a United Kingdom constitutional law and labour law case that found the conduct of the Department for Work and Pensions "workfare" policy was unlawful. Caitlin Reilly, an unemployed geology graduate, and Jamieson Wilson, an unemployed driver, challenged the Jobcentre policy of making the unemployed work for private companies to get unemployment income. The outcome of the case affects over 3,000 claimants and entails around £130m unpaid benefits.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	R (Reilly and Wilson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] UKSC 68 is a United Kingdom constitutional law and labour law case that found the conduct of the Department for Work and Pensions "workfare" policy was unlawful. Caitlin Reilly, an unemployed geology graduate, and Jamieson Wilson, an unemployed driver, challenged the Jobcentre policy of making the unemployed work for private companies to get unemployment income. The outcome of the case affects over 3,000 claimants and entails around £130m unpaid benefits. (en)
dbo:thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Poundland,_Belfast,_June_2010.jpg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/68.html
dbo:wikiPageID	36696420 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	29921 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1117154691 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Poundland dbr:Roger_Toulson,_Lord_Toulson dbr:David_Neuberger,_Baron_Neuberger_of_Abbotsbury dbr:Department_for_Work_and_Pensions dbr:Jonathan_Mance,_Baron_Mance dbr:Jonathan_Sumption dbr:Unemployment_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Ultra_vires dbc:2013_in_British_law dbc:2013_in_case_law dbr:William_Beveridge dbr:Jobseekers_(Back_to_Work_Schemes)_Act_2013 dbr:Jobseekers_Act_1995 dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbr:United_Kingdom_constitutional_law dbr:Workfare dbr:Article_4_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights dbc:Unemployment_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:United_Kingdom_labour_case_law dbc:Workfare_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:United_Kingdom_constitutional_case_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Anthony_Clarke,_Baron_Clarke_of_Stone-cum-Ebony dbr:European_Convention_on_Human_Rights dbr:Workfare_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Youth_unemployment_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Right_to_a_fair_trial dbr:Jobcentre dbr:Jobseeker's_Allowance_(Employment,_Ski...d_Enterprise_Scheme)_Regulations_2011 dbr:UK_labour_law dbr:Work_Programme_(United_Kingdom) dbr:Lord_Neuberger dbr:Lord_Toulson dbr:Public_Interest_Lawyers dbr:Schuitemaker_v_Netherlands dbr:Talmon_v_Netherlands dbr:X_v_Netherlands
dbp:concurring	Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Clarke (en)
dbp:court	dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
dbp:dateDecided	2013-10-30 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy	Lord Neuberger, Lord Toulson (en)
dbp:fullName	R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (en)
dbp:keywords	(en) administrative law (en) forced labour (en) ultra vires (en)
dbp:name	R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges	5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:transcripts	http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/68.html
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Italic_title dbt:Ordered_list dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Ubl dbt:Use_British_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Workfare_in_the_United_Kingdom dbt:Infobox_court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:2013_in_British_law dbc:2013_in_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbc:Unemployment_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:United_Kingdom_labour_case_law dbc:Workfare_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:United_Kingdom_constitutional_case_law
gold:hypernym	dbr:Case
rdf:type	dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	R (Reilly and Wilson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] UKSC 68 is a United Kingdom constitutional law and labour law case that found the conduct of the Department for Work and Pensions "workfare" policy was unlawful. Caitlin Reilly, an unemployed geology graduate, and Jamieson Wilson, an unemployed driver, challenged the Jobcentre policy of making the unemployed work for private companies to get unemployment income. The outcome of the case affects over 3,000 claimants and entails around £130m unpaid benefits. (en)
rdfs:label	R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions wikidata:R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4egnv
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:R_(Reilly)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions?oldid=1117154691&ns=0
foaf:depiction	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Poundland,_Belfast,_June_2010.jpg
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:R_(Reilly)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Caitlin_Reilly_and_Jamieson_Wilson_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions dbr:R_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions,_ex_p_Reilly dbr:Jobseeker's_Allowance_(Employment,_Ski...d_Enterprise_Scheme)_Regulations_2011 dbr:The_Jobseeker's_Allowance_(Employment,...d_Enterprise_Scheme)_Regulations_2011
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Roger_Toulson,_Lord_Toulson dbr:List_of_United_Kingdom_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:United_Kingdom_labour_law dbr:2013_Judgments_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Human_rights_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Iain_Duncan_Smith dbr:Caitlin_Reilly_and_Jamieson_Wilson_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions dbr:Iain_Duncan_Smith's_tenure_as_Work_and_Pensions_Secretary dbr:R_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions,_ex_p_Reilly dbr:Jobseeker's_Allowance_(Employment,_Ski...d_Enterprise_Scheme)_Regulations_2011 dbr:The_Jobseeker's_Allowance_(Employment,...d_Enterprise_Scheme)_Regulations_2011
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:R_(Reilly)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions