An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

People v. Aguilar, 2 N.E.3d 321 (Ill. 2013), was an Illinois Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon (AUUF) statute violated the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment. The Court stated that this was because the statute amounted to a wholesale statutory ban on the exercise of a personal right that was specifically named in and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, as construed by the United States Supreme Court. A conviction for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm (UPF) was proper because the possession of handguns by minors was conduct that fell outside the scope of the Second Amendment's protection.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • People v. Aguilar, 2 N.E.3d 321 (Ill. 2013), was an Illinois Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon (AUUF) statute violated the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment. The Court stated that this was because the statute amounted to a wholesale statutory ban on the exercise of a personal right that was specifically named in and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, as construed by the United States Supreme Court. A conviction for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm (UPF) was proper because the possession of handguns by minors was conduct that fell outside the scope of the Second Amendment's protection. In 2008, Alberto Aguilar, then 17, was arrested and charged with AUUF and UPF. After being convicted and sentenced to probation by the trial court, he appealed, arguing that both statutes were unconstitutional infringements of his Second Amendment rights. The Illinois Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction, and he appealed that ruling to the Illinois Supreme Court. While Aguilar's appeal was pending, the Federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that the AUUF statute was unconstitutional. When the matter was decided by the Illinois Supreme Court, they agreed with the Seventh Circuit and declared the AUUF law unconstitutional, but upheld the constitutionality of the UPF law. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 40585827 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 24273 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1094625805 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caption
  • Seal of the Supreme Court of Illinois (en)
dbp:citations
  • 25920.0
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 2013-09-12 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy
  • J. Thomas (en)
dbp:fullName
  • People of the State of Illinois v. Alberto Aguilar (en)
dbp:imagealt
  • Seal of the Supreme Court of Illinois (en)
dbp:imagesize
  • 100 (xsd:integer)
dbp:judges
  • CJ. Thomas L. Kilbride; JJ. Charles E. Freeman, Robert R. Thomas, Rita B. Garman, Lloyd A. Karmeier, Anne M. Burke, Mary Jane Theis (en)
dbp:name
  • People v. Aguilar (en)
dbp:opinions
  • Reversed in part and affirmed in part. On its face, Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon, , violated the right to keep and bear arms, as guaranteed by the Second Amendment, because it amounted to a wholesale statutory ban on the exercise of a personal right that was specifically named in and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, as construed by the United States Supreme Court; Defendant's conviction for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm, , was proper because the possession of handguns by minors was conduct that fell outside the scope of the Second Amendment's protection. (en)
dbp:priorActions
  • 17280.0
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • People v. Aguilar, 2 N.E.3d 321 (Ill. 2013), was an Illinois Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Weapon (AUUF) statute violated the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment. The Court stated that this was because the statute amounted to a wholesale statutory ban on the exercise of a personal right that was specifically named in and guaranteed by the United States Constitution, as construed by the United States Supreme Court. A conviction for Unlawful Possession of a Firearm (UPF) was proper because the possession of handguns by minors was conduct that fell outside the scope of the Second Amendment's protection. (en)
rdfs:label
  • People v. Aguilar (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License