About: Pearson v Wynn

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Pearson v Wynn (1986) 2 NZCPR 449 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the requirement under section 7(4)(b) of the Contractual Remedies Act 1970 that a breach of contract must be "substantial" for a contract to be cancelled.

thumbnail
Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Pearson v Wynn (1986) 2 NZCPR 449 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the requirement under section 7(4)(b) of the Contractual Remedies Act 1970 that a breach of contract must be "substantial" for a contract to be cancelled. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 46329944 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 1931 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1084649515 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:citations
  • 2 (xsd:integer)
dbp:court
dbp:fullName
  • Pearson v Wynn (en)
dbp:imagesize
  • 200 (xsd:integer)
dbp:judges
  • Wlliamson J (en)
dbp:name
  • Pearson v Wynn (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Pearson v Wynn (1986) 2 NZCPR 449 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the requirement under section 7(4)(b) of the Contractual Remedies Act 1970 that a breach of contract must be "substantial" for a contract to be cancelled. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Pearson v Wynn (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License