About: Ouellette v. Viacom International Inc.

An Entity of Type: WikicatUnitedStatesDistrictCourtCases, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Ouellette v. Viacom, No. 9:10-cv-00133; 2011 WL 1882780, found the safe harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) did not create liability for service providers that take down non-infringing works (works having a fair use defense to copyright infringement). This case limited the claims that can be filed against service providers by establishing immunity for service providers' takedown of fair use material, at least from grounds under the DMCA. The court left open whether another "independent basis of liability" could serve as legal grounds for an inappropriate takedown.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Ouellette v. Viacom, No. 9:10-cv-00133; 2011 WL 1882780, found the safe harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) did not create liability for service providers that take down non-infringing works (works having a fair use defense to copyright infringement). This case limited the claims that can be filed against service providers by establishing immunity for service providers' takedown of fair use material, at least from grounds under the DMCA. The court left open whether another "independent basis of liability" could serve as legal grounds for an inappropriate takedown. The court's opinion was also noteworthy in its treatment of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), holding that online service providers were not liable for failure to provide accommodations to persons with disabilities unless their service is "tightly integrated" with a physical space. (en)
dbo:thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/MontanaDistrictCourt.gif?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://1.next.westlaw.com/Document/I3a98024e818c11e0af6af9916f973d19/View/FullText.html%3FtransitionType=UniqueDocItem&contextData=(sc.Default) https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=16043862805835728767&q=Weyer+v.+Twentieth+Cent.+Fox+Film+Corp&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fq=Eldred+v.+Ashcroft,+537+U.S.+186,+219%E2%80%93220+(2003)&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5&case=12147684852241107557&scilh=0 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fq=Ouellette+v.+Viacom&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5&case=3753744983787595468&scilh=0 https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4857953/ouellette-v-viacom-international-inc/ https://www.scribd.com/doc/44623969/Ouellette-v-Viacom-Complaint
dbo:wikiPageID	34942016 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	14239 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1103665439 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:2011_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Pro_se dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Montana dbc:United_States_Internet_case_law dbr:Copyright_infringement dbr:Complaint dbr:Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990 dbc:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act_case_law dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbc:United_States_district_court_cases dbr:DMCA dbr:Fair_use dbr:Cause_of_action dbr:Legal_liability dbc:Paramount_Global dbc:Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990 dbr:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act dbr:Donald_W._Molloy dbr:Docket_number dbr:Safe_harbor_(law) dbr:In_Forma_Pauperis dbr:Plaintiff dbr:Terms_of_Service dbr:Movie_theater dbr:American_Disabilities_Act dbr:Takedown_notice
dbp:citations	2011 (xsd:integer)
dbp:court	dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Montana
dbp:dateDecided	2011-03-31 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket	9 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullName	Ouellette v. Viacom International Inc. et al (en)
dbp:holding	Service providers had no liability for taking down videos that may have been fair uses. The court also found no liability for online service providers who do not meet the needs of disabled persons. (en)
dbp:judge	Jeremiah C. Lynch (en)
dbp:keywords	dbr:DMCA dbr:Safe_harbor_(law) dbr:American_Disabilities_Act
dbp:name	Ouellette v. Viacom (en)
dbp:subsequentActions	Donald W. Molloy's order adopting the magistrate judge's findings; 2011 WL 1883190 (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:USC dbt:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:2011_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Internet_case_law dbc:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act_case_law dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbc:United_States_district_court_cases dbc:Paramount_Global dbc:Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990
rdf:type	yago:WikicatUnitedStatesDistrictCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:comment	Ouellette v. Viacom, No. 9:10-cv-00133; 2011 WL 1882780, found the safe harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) did not create liability for service providers that take down non-infringing works (works having a fair use defense to copyright infringement). This case limited the claims that can be filed against service providers by establishing immunity for service providers' takedown of fair use material, at least from grounds under the DMCA. The court left open whether another "independent basis of liability" could serve as legal grounds for an inappropriate takedown. (en)
rdfs:label	Ouellette v. Viacom International Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Ouellette v. Viacom International Inc. yago-res:Ouellette v. Viacom International Inc. wikidata:Ouellette v. Viacom International Inc. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4sp2U
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Ouellette_v._Viacom_International_Inc.?oldid=1103665439&ns=0
foaf:depiction	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/MontanaDistrictCourt.gif
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Ouellette_v._Viacom_International_Inc.
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Pro_se_legal_representation_in_the_United_States dbr:List_of_copyright_case_law dbr:Timeline_of_disability_rights_in_the_United_States dbr:Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990 dbr:YouTube dbr:Young_v._Facebook,_Inc. dbr:IT_law dbr:National_Federation_of_the_Blind_v._Target_Corp.
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Ouellette_v._Viacom_International_Inc.