About: Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson, 550 U.S. 511 (2007) is a United States Supreme court case in which the court held that it did not have jurisdiction under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to review a wrongful termination suit brought against United States Senator Mark Dayton, where the lower courts did not rule on the constitutionality of the Act. This case was the first Speech or Debate Clause case the Supreme Court took up since 1979.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson, 550 U.S. 511 (2007) is a United States Supreme court case in which the court held that it did not have jurisdiction under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to review a wrongful termination suit brought against United States Senator Mark Dayton, where the lower courts did not rule on the constitutionality of the Act. This case was the first Speech or Debate Clause case the Supreme Court took up since 1979. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/06pdf/06-618.pdf https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/550/511/%23tab-opinion-1962421 https://web.archive.org/web/20201229213314/https:/www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/public_education/preview/2006-2007_vol-34/issue-7.pdf%7Carchive-date=2020-12-29 https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-618.ZS.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/2006/06-618 https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/public_education/preview/2006-2007_vol-34/issue-7.pdf%7Cjournal=Preview
dbo:wikiPageID	66240614 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	11460 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1122975952 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:En_banc dbr:Barney_Frank dbr:David_S._Tatel dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Chris_Shays dbr:Mitch_McConnell dbr:Mootness dbr:Concurring_opinion dbr:Congressional_Accountability_Act_of_1995 dbr:Constitutionality dbr:Michael_Brodkorb dbr:2006_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_John_Paul_Stevens dbr:Tony_Sutton dbr:Jurisdiction dbr:2006_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990 dbr:Family_and_Medical_Leave_Act_of_1993 dbr:Fort_Snelling_unorganized_territory dbr:Harry_Reid dbc:2007_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Leave_of_absence dbr:Wrongful_dismissal dbr:Mark_Dayton dbc:United_States_case_law dbr:Certiorari dbr:Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Speech_or_Debate_Clause
dbp:arguedate	0001-04-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2007 (xsd:integer)
dbp:decidedate	0001-05-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2007 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket	6 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Office of Senator Mark Dayton, appellant v. Brad Hanson (en)
dbp:holding	The court did not have jurisdiction under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to review a wrongful termination suit brought against United States Senator Mark Dayton, where the lower courts did not rule on the constitutionality of the Act. (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito (en)
dbp:lawsapplied	Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (en)
dbp:litigants	Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson (en)
dbp:majority	Stevens (en)
dbp:notparticipating	Roberts (en)
dbp:opinionannouncement	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2006/06-618
dbp:oralargument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2006/06-618
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:questionspresented	Does the Speech or Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution bar federal court jurisdiction of suits under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 by congressional employees whose job duties are part of the due functioning of the legislative process? Was the Office of Senator Mark Dayton entitled to appeal the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit directly to the Supreme Court? *Was the case rendered moot by the expiration of Senator Dayton's term of office? (en)
dbp:uspage	511 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	550 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Primary dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Refbegin dbt:Refend dbt:Reflist dbt:Sfn dbt:Infobox_US_Supreme_Court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2007_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson, 550 U.S. 511 (2007) is a United States Supreme court case in which the court held that it did not have jurisdiction under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to review a wrongful termination suit brought against United States Senator Mark Dayton, where the lower courts did not rule on the constitutionality of the Act. This case was the first Speech or Debate Clause case the Supreme Court took up since 1979. (en)
rdfs:label	Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:Office of Senator Mark Dayton v. Hanson https://global.dbpedia.org/id/FTnHf
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Office_of_Senator_Mark_Dayton_v._Hanson?oldid=1122975952&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Office_of_Senator_Mark_Dayton_v._Hanson
foaf:name	Office of Senator Mark Dayton, appellant v. Brad Hanson (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Office_of_Senator_Mark_Dayton_v_Hanson
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Office_of_Senator_Mark_Dayton_v_Hanson
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Office_of_Senator_Mark_Dayton_v._Hanson