An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs, [1979] 1 SCR 311, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian administrative law. The decision was a landmark reform of administrative law, in which the Court significantly increased the degree of court intervention on procedural grounds. The Court stated that procedural fairness exists on a continuum and that parties are entitled to a certain degree of it based on the setting and their circumstances. Prior to this decision, procedural fairness only applied to tribunals that were classified as "judicial" or "quasi-judicial".

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs, [1979] 1 SCR 311, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian administrative law. The decision was a landmark reform of administrative law, in which the Court significantly increased the degree of court intervention on procedural grounds. The Court stated that procedural fairness exists on a continuum and that parties are entitled to a certain degree of it based on the setting and their circumstances. Prior to this decision, procedural fairness only applied to tribunals that were classified as "judicial" or "quasi-judicial". (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 10604120 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 4164 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 680639102 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1979] 1 SCR 311, 1978 CanLII 24 (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1978-10-03 (xsd:date)
dbp:dissent
  • Martland J. (en)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Arthur Gwyn Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Board of Commissioners of Police (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 1978-02-22 (xsd:date)
dbp:history
  • On appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Pigeon, Beetz, Pratte JJ. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Ritchie, Spence, Dickson, and Estey JJ. (en)
dbp:lawsapplied
  • 155.0
dbp:majority
  • Laskin C.J. (en)
dbp:ratio
  • Holder of a public office is entitled to some degree of procedural fairness and must be treated fairly and not arbitrarily. (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal allowed (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1977 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs, [1979] 1 SCR 311, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian administrative law. The decision was a landmark reform of administrative law, in which the Court significantly increased the degree of court intervention on procedural grounds. The Court stated that procedural fairness exists on a continuum and that parties are entitled to a certain degree of it based on the setting and their circumstances. Prior to this decision, procedural fairness only applied to tribunals that were classified as "judicial" or "quasi-judicial". (en)
rdfs:label
  • Nicholson v Haldimand-Norfolk Reg Police Commrs (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License